Cited by 140Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling

In vitro and in vivo characterization of A‐796260: a selective cannabinoid CB2receptor agonist exhibiting analgesic activity in rodent pain models

Open access
Yao, B B, Hsieh, G C, Frost, J M, Fan, Y, Garrison, T R, Daza, A V, Grayson, G K, Zhu, C Z +8 more·2008·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Background and purpose: Selective cannabinoid CB 2 receptor agonists have demonstrated analgesic activity across multiple preclinical pain models. AM1241 is an indole derivative that exhibits high affinity and selectivity for the CB 2 binding site and broad spectrum analgesic activity in rodent models, but is not an antagonist of CB 2in vitro functional assays. Additionally, its analgesic effects are μ‐opioid receptor‐dependent. Herein, we describe the in vitro and in vivo pharmacological properties of A‐796260, a novel CB 2 agonist. Experimental approach: A‐796260 was characterized in radioligand binding and in vitro functional assays at rat and human CB 1 and CB 2 receptors. The behavioural profile of A‐796260 was assessed in models of inflammatory, post‐operative, neuropathic, and osteoarthritic (OA) pain, as well as its effects on motor activity. The receptor specificity was confirmed using selective CB 1, CB 2 and μ‐opioid receptor antagonists. Key results: A‐796260 exhibited high affinity and agonist efficacy at human and rat CB 2 receptors, and was selective for the CB 2 vs CB 1 subtype. Efficacy in models of inflammatory, post‐operative, neuropathic and OA pain was demonstrated, and these activities were selectively blocked by CB 2, but not CB 1 or μ‐opioid receptor‐selective antagonists. Efficacy was achieved at doses that had no significant effects on motor activity. Conclusions and implications: These results further confirm the therapeutic potential of CB 2 receptor‐selective agonists for the treatment of pain. In addition, they demonstrate that A‐796260 may be a useful new pharmacological compound for further studying CB 2 receptor pharmacology and for evaluating its role in the modulation of pain. British Journal of Pharmacology(2008)153, 390–401; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707568; published online 12 November 2007

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707568

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 140

Authors
Yao, B. B., Hsieh, G. C., Frost, J. M., Fan, Y., Garrison, T. R., Daza, A. V., Grayson, G. K., Zhu, C. Z., Pai, M., Chandran, P., Salyers, A. K., Wensink, E. J., Honore, P., Sullivan, J. P., Dart, M. J., & Meyer, M. D.
Affiliations
Abbott (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Meyer, M D
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01
Volume
153
Issue
2
Pages
390-401
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2009738204
Cited by
140
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Keywords
AM1241, analgesia, inflammatory pain, postoperative pain, neuropathic pain, osteoarthritis pain, mu-opioid receptor, motor activity, radioligand binding, CB1 receptor
MeSH terms
Animals, Arthritis, Experimental, Cells, Cultured, Constriction, Pathologic, Cyclohexanols, Cyclopropanes, Humans, Hyperalgesia, Immunosuppressive Agents, Joints, Male, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Morpholines, Motor Activity, Pain, Radioligand Assay, Sciatica, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases, Analgesics, Non-Narcotic, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review