Cited by 129Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Identification of ter94, Drosophila VCP, as a modulator of polyglutamine-induced neurodegeneration

Higashiyama, H, Hirose, F, Yamaguchi, M, Inoue, Y H, Fujikake, N, Matsukage, A, Kakizuka, A·2002·Cell Death & Differentiation

Abstract

We have successfully generated a Drosophila model of human polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases by the targeted expression of expanded-polyQ (ex-polyQ) in the Drosophila compound eye. The resulting eye degeneration is progressive and ex-polyQ dosage- and ex-polyQ length-dependent. Furthermore, intergenerational changes in repeat length were observed in homozygotes, with concomitant changes in the levels of degeneration. Through genetic screening, using this fly model, we identified loss-of-function mutants of the ter94 gene that encodes the Drosophila homolog of VCP/CDC48, a member of the AAA+ class of the ATPase protein family, as dominant suppressors. The suppressive effects of the ter94 mutants on ex-polyQ-induced neurodegeneration correlated well with the degrees of loss-of-function, but appeared not to result from the inhibition of ex-polyQ aggregate formation. In the ex-polyQ-expressing cells of the late pupa, an upregulation of ter94 expression was observed prior to cell death. Co-expression of ter94 with ex-polyQ severely enhanced eye degeneration. Interestingly, when ter94 was overexpressed in the eye by increasing the transgene copies, severe eye degeneration was induced. Furthermore, genetical studies revealed that ter94 was not involved in grim-, reaper-, hid-, ced4-, or p53-induced cell death pathways. From these observations, we propose that VCP is a novel cell death effector molecule in ex-polyQ-induced neurodegeneration, where the amount of VCP is critical. Control…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400955

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 45 · Cited by 129

Authors
Higashiyama, H., Hirose, F., Yamaguchi, M., Inoue, Y. H., Fujikake, N., Matsukage, A., & Kakizuka, A.
Affiliations
  • Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Cell Death & Differentiation
Published
2002-02-25
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
264-273
ISSN
  • 1350-9047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5403
OpenAlex
W2064136366
Cited by
129
References
45
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell Death and Differentiation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
polyglutamine diseases, neurodegeneration, Drosophila compound eye, AAA+ ATPase, cell death, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Valosin Containing Protein, Adenosine Triphosphatases, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Drosophila melanogaster, Eye, Mutation, Peptides, Phenotype, Apoptosis, Cell Cycle Proteins, Trinucleotide Repeats, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review