Cited by 190Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietBody Composition Measurement Techniques

A 7-day activity diary for assessment of daily energy expenditure validated by the doubly labelled water method in adolescents

Bratteby, L-E, Sandhagen, Bo, Fan, Hu, Samuelson, G·1997·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives To validate the use of an activity diary and predicted BMR for assessment of daily total energy expenditure (TEE) and physical activity level (PAL = TEE/BMR) in adolescents.Design TEE and PAL estimated from activity diary records kept for seven days and BMR predicted from age, gender and body weight were compared with the results of doubly labelled water (DLW) measurements and indirect calorimetry performed during the same time period.Setting The Unit of paediatric Physiology of the Department of Clinical Physiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.Subjects Fifty randomly selected 15 y old adolescents (25 boys and 25 girls).Results The mean difference between TEE estimated in all adolescents by the activity diary and by DLW methods was 1.2%. The limits of agreement (mean difference 2 s.d.) were -3.47 and 3.77 MD/d, equivalent to a coefficient of variation of 15%. The mean difference between PAL assessed by activity diary records and by DLW measurements was 0.001, and the limits of agreement between the two methods were 0.54.Conclusions The results imply that the activity diary method provides a close estimate of TEE and PAL in population groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600449

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 190

Authors
Bratteby, L.-E., Sandhagen, B., Fan, H., & Samuelson, G.
Affiliations
Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
585-591
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2171760976
Cited by
190
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
activity diaries, daily energy expenditure, physical activity level, adolescents, doubly labeled water, basal metabolic rate, method validation, indirect calorimetry, energy expenditure estimation
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Basal Metabolism, Calorimetry, Indirect, Deuterium, Energy Metabolism, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Male, Oxygen Isotopes, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sweden, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review