Effect of glucose, sucrose and fructose on plasma glucose and insulin responses in normal humans: comparison with white bread
Abstract
Objective To determine the plasma glucose and insulin responses of various doses of glucose, sucrose, fructose and white bread in normal human subjects. Design Plasma glucose and insulin were measured before and at various times after 8 subjects ate 13 different test meals in randomized order on separate days after an overnight fast. Test meals consisted of 500 ml of tea or water to which was added either nothing, 25, 50, or 100 g of glucose or sucrose, 25 or 50 g fructose, 50 g glucose plus 50 g fructose, or a 25, 50 or 100 g carbohydrate portion of white bread. The glycaemic (GI) and insulinaemic index (II) values of the sugars were calculated by expressing the incremental areas under the plasma glucose and insulin curves (AUC) after glucose, sucrose and fructose as a percentage of the respective AUC after white bread containing the same amount of carbohydrate. Setting University teaching hospital clinical nutrition centre. Subjects Lean, normal subjects (4 male, 4 female) 21-33 y of age. Results Plasma insulin responses increased nearly linearly as carbohydrate intake increased from 0 to 100 g, but glycaemic responses increased by only 68% and 38% as carbohydrate intake increased from 25 to 50 g and 50 to 100g, respectively. The GI and II values of glucose, 149+/-16 and 147+/-18, respectively, were significantly greater than those of bread (100; P Conclusions It is concluded that, in normal subjects, as carbohydrate intake is increased from 0 to 100 g, plasma insulin respo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dose-response curve is curvilinear and tends to plateau at carbohydrate intakes above 50 g.
“However, the dose -response curve is curvilinear and shows a trend to plateau at intakes greater than 50 g CHO.”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Lee & Wolever, 1998
Increasing carbohydrate intake increases incremental AUC glucose response in a dose-response manner in healthy subjects.
“Increasing the intake quantity of CHO increases incremental AUC glucose response in a dose -response manner in healthy subjects (Wolever & Bolognesi, 1996a;Lee & Wolever, 1998).”
From Glycaemic index methodology (2005) · cites this paper as Lee & Wolever, 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brouns, F., Bjorck, I., Frayn, K. N., Gibbs, A. L., Lang, V., Slama, G., & Wolever, T. M. S. (2005) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr2005100 · Cited by 1,061 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lee, B., & Woleve, T.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 924-928
- ISSN
- 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5640
- OpenAlex
- W2060103626
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- glucose, sucrose, fructose, white bread, glycemic index, plasma glucose, plasma insulin, carbohydrate intake, test meal, dietary sugar
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Bread, Female, Fructose, Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Kinetics, Male, Sucrose, Tea
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review