Breakfast glycaemic response in patients with type 2 diabetes: effects of bedtime dietary carbohydrates
Abstract
Objectives Bedtime carbohydrate (CHO) intake in patients with type-2 diabetes may improve glucose tolerance at breakfast the next morning. We examined the 'overnight second-meal effect' of bedtime supplements containing 'rapid' or 'slow' CHOs.Design Randomized cross-over study with three test-periods, each consisting of two days on a standardized diet, followed by a breakfast tolerance test on the third morning.Setting The Lundberg Laboratory for Diabetes Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.Subjects Sixteen patients with type 2 diabetes on oral agents and/or diet.Interventions Two different bedtime (22.00 h) CHO supplements (0.46 g available CHO/kg body weight) were compared to a starch-free placebo ('normal' food regimen). The CHOs were provided as uncooked cornstarch (slow-release CHOs) or white bread (rapid CHOs).Results On the mornings after different bedtime meals we found similar fasting glucose, insulin, free fatty acid and lactate levels. However, the glycaemic response after breakfast was 21% less after uncooked cornstarch compared to placebo ingestion at bedtime (406 +/- 46 vs 511 +/- 61 mmol min l(-1), P < 0.01). In contrast, it did not differ when the evening meal consisted of white bread (451 +/- 57 mmol min l(-1)) compared to placebo. According to an in vitro analysis, uncooked cornstarch contained approximately 4 times more slowly digestible starch as compared to white bread.Conclusions A bedtime meal providing uncooked cornstarch improved breakfast tolerance the next morning while, in contrast, this was not found following a bedtime meal of white bread. The results are consistent, therefore, with the concept that an increased intake of slowly digestible carbohydrates exert an overnight second-meal effect in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The actions of carbohydrate on metabolism persist well beyond the postprandial state, as demonstrated by the second meal effect and the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on fasting insulin.
“the actions of carbohydrate on metabolism persist well beyond the postprandial state, as demonstrated by the “second meal effect,” wherein the GI of supper influences glucose tolerance the next day (161, 162), and by the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on fasting insulin (163).”
From The carbohydrate-insulin model: A physiological perspective on the obesity pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [161]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 60
- Authors
- Axelsen, M., Arvidsson Lenner, R., Lönnroth, P., & Smith, U.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 706-710
- ISSN
- 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5640
- OpenAlex
- W2045316003
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, uncooked cornstarch, slowly digestible starch, white bread, glucose tolerance, insulin response, free fatty acids, lactate
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dietary Carbohydrates, Digestion, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Humans, Insulin, Lactates, Male, Middle Aged, Starch, Time Factors, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review