Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake
Abstract
Objectives To estimate the total (CVt), within-subject (CVw) and between-subject (CVb) variation in free-living energy expenditure as measured by the doubly-labelled water (DLW) technique. To examine the limitation of the DLW measurement of energy expenditure for evaluating reported energy intake. To estimate the probable minimum and maximum 'habitual' energy expenditures for a sustainable lifestyle. Design Review and analysis of individual data from 25 studies with repeat DLW measurements of energy expenditure (EE). Results Pooled mean CVw derived from 21 studies was 11.8% for EE and 12.3% for physical activity level (PAL). Multiple regression analysis of CVw in 25 studies found a positive association with time span between measurements. At zero time CVw for EE was 8.2% rising to 9.6% at 13 weeks and 15.4% at 52 weeks. At the same time points CVw for PAL was 9.1%, 10.0% and 13.4% respectively. Pooled mean CVt was 13.0% for EE and 10.7% for PAL. CVb calculated from pooled mean CVt and CVw was 20.6% for EE and 7.2% for PAL. 95% confidence limits of PAL in 11 age-sex groups averaged 1.2 to 2.2. Conclusions The analysis supported previous estimates of 8% for within-subject variation in DLW measurements including analytic plus inherent biologic variation. Variation that included changes in weight, season and activity increased with increased time between measurements to about 15% at a time span of 12 months. Confidence limits of agreement between EE and reported energy intake wer…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 247
- Authors
- Black, A., & Cole, T.
- ORCID
- Black, AE
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 386-394
- ISSN
- 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5640
- OpenAlex
- W2039943458
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Keywords
- energy expenditure, doubly labeled water, within-person variability, interindividual variability, physical activity level, energy intake, measurement error, repeated measures, sustainable living
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Child, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Isotope Labeling, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Regression Analysis, Water, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review