Cited by 247Physical Activity and HealthNutrition and Health StudiesBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake

Black, AE, Cole, TJ·2000·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives To estimate the total (CVt), within-subject (CVw) and between-subject (CVb) variation in free-living energy expenditure as measured by the doubly-labelled water (DLW) technique. To examine the limitation of the DLW measurement of energy expenditure for evaluating reported energy intake. To estimate the probable minimum and maximum 'habitual' energy expenditures for a sustainable lifestyle. Design Review and analysis of individual data from 25 studies with repeat DLW measurements of energy expenditure (EE). Results Pooled mean CVw derived from 21 studies was 11.8% for EE and 12.3% for physical activity level (PAL). Multiple regression analysis of CVw in 25 studies found a positive association with time span between measurements. At zero time CVw for EE was 8.2% rising to 9.6% at 13 weeks and 15.4% at 52 weeks. At the same time points CVw for PAL was 9.1%, 10.0% and 13.4% respectively. Pooled mean CVt was 13.0% for EE and 10.7% for PAL. CVb calculated from pooled mean CVt and CVw was 20.6% for EE and 7.2% for PAL. 95% confidence limits of PAL in 11 age-sex groups averaged 1.2 to 2.2. Conclusions The analysis supported previous estimates of 8% for within-subject variation in DLW measurements including analytic plus inherent biologic variation. Variation that included changes in weight, season and activity increased with increased time between measurements to about 15% at a time span of 12 months. Confidence limits of agreement between EE and reported energy intake wer…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600970

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 247

Authors
Black, A., & Cole, T.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
386-394
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2039943458
Cited by
247
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
energy expenditure, doubly labeled water, within-person variability, interindividual variability, physical activity level, energy intake, measurement error, repeated measures, sustainable living
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Child, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Isotope Labeling, Male, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Regression Analysis, Water, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review