Prospective study of coffee consumption and risk of Parkinson’s disease
Abstract
Objective To examine the prediction of coffee consumption on the incidence of Parkinson's disease.Subjects and methods The study population comprised 6710 men and women, aged 50-79 years and free from Parkinson's disease at the baseline. At baseline, enquiries were made about coffee consumption in a self-administered questionnaire as the average number of cups per day. During a 22-year follow-up, 101 incident cases of Parkinson's disease occurred. Parkinson's disease cases were identified through a nationwide registry of patients receiving medication reimbursement, which is based on certificates from neurologist.Results After adjustments for age, sex, marital status, education, community density, alcohol consumption, leisure-time physical activity, smoking, body mass index, hypertension and serum cholesterol, the relative risk for subjects drinking 10 or more cups of coffee per day compared with non-drinkers was 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.99, P-value for trend=0.18). The association was stronger among overweight persons and among persons with lower serum cholesterol level (P-value for interaction=0.04 and 0.03, respectively).Conclusions The results support the hypothesis that coffee consumption reduces the risk of Parkinson's disease, but protective effect of coffee may vary by exposure to other factors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Large cohort studies of men and women have found an inverse relationship between caffeine consumption and the risk of Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.
“Finally, large cohort studies of men and women have also found an inverse relationship between caffeine consumption and the risk of Parkinson’s disease (90–92) and Alzheimer’s disease (93–95).”
From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [92]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 182
- Authors
- Sääksjärvi, K., Knekt, P., Rissanen, H., Laaksonen, M. A., Reunanen, A., & Männistö, S.
- Corresponding author
- Knekt, P
- Venue
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Published
- 2007-05-16
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 908-915
- ISSN
- 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5640
- OpenAlex
- W2080820466
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES012667)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- coffee consumption, Parkinson's disease, disease incidence, protective effect, overweight, serum cholesterol, modifiable risk factors, neurodegenerative diseases
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Aged, Caffeine, Coffee, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Parkinson Disease, Secondary, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Prevalence, Linear Models, Proportional Hazards Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review