Cited by 182Coffee research and impactsParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Prospective study of coffee consumption and risk of Parkinson’s disease

Sääksjärvi, K, Knekt, P, Rissanen, H, Laaksonen, M A, Reunanen, A, Männistö, S·2008·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To examine the prediction of coffee consumption on the incidence of Parkinson's disease.Subjects and methods The study population comprised 6710 men and women, aged 50-79 years and free from Parkinson's disease at the baseline. At baseline, enquiries were made about coffee consumption in a self-administered questionnaire as the average number of cups per day. During a 22-year follow-up, 101 incident cases of Parkinson's disease occurred. Parkinson's disease cases were identified through a nationwide registry of patients receiving medication reimbursement, which is based on certificates from neurologist.Results After adjustments for age, sex, marital status, education, community density, alcohol consumption, leisure-time physical activity, smoking, body mass index, hypertension and serum cholesterol, the relative risk for subjects drinking 10 or more cups of coffee per day compared with non-drinkers was 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.99, P-value for trend=0.18). The association was stronger among overweight persons and among persons with lower serum cholesterol level (P-value for interaction=0.04 and 0.03, respectively).Conclusions The results support the hypothesis that coffee consumption reduces the risk of Parkinson's disease, but protective effect of coffee may vary by exposure to other factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602788

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large cohort studies of men and women have found an inverse relationship between caffeine consumption and the risk of Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease.

    “Finally, large cohort studies of men and women have also found an inverse relationship between caffeine consumption and the risk of Parkinson’s disease (90–92) and Alzheimer’s disease (93–95).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [92]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 182

Authors
Sääksjärvi, K., Knekt, P., Rissanen, H., Laaksonen, M. A., Reunanen, A., & Männistö, S.
Corresponding author
Knekt, P
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2007-05-16
Volume
62
Issue
7
Pages
908-915
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2080820466
Cited by
182
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES012667)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
coffee consumption, Parkinson's disease, disease incidence, protective effect, overweight, serum cholesterol, modifiable risk factors, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Caffeine, Coffee, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Parkinson Disease, Secondary, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Prevalence, Linear Models, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review