Cited by 396Cell Adhesion Molecules ResearchHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

E‐cadherin‐mediated adhesion inhibits ligand‐dependent activation of diverse receptor tyrosine kinases

Open access
Qian, Xiaolan, Karpova, Tatiana, Sheppard, Allan M, McNally, James, Lowy, Douglas R·2004·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

E-cadherin is an essential adhesion protein as well as a tumor suppressor that is silenced in many cancers. Its adhesion-dependent regulation of signaling has not been elucidated. We report that E-cadherin can negatively regulate, in an adhesion-dependent manner, the ligand-dependent activation of divergent classes of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), by inhibiting their ligand-dependent activation in association with decreases in receptor mobility and in ligand-binding affinity. E-cadherin did not regulate a constitutively active mutant RTK (Neu*) or the ligand-dependent activation of LPA receptors or muscarinic receptors, which are two classes of G protein-coupled receptors. EGFR regulation by E-cadherin was associated with complex formation between EGFR and E-cadherin that depended on the extracellular domain of E-cadherin but was independent of beta-catenin binding or p120-catenin binding. Transfection of E-cadherin conferred negative RTK regulation to human melanoma and breast cancer lines with downregulated endogenous E-cadherin. Abrogation of E-cadherin regulation may contribute to the frequent ligand-dependent activation of RTK in tumors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600136

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both c-Met and EGFR are known to form complexes with E-cadherin in cancer cells, and formation of such complexes is usually associated with inhibition of c-Met or EGFR phosphorylation.

    “While both c-Met and EGFR are known to form complexes with E-cadherin in cancer cells, the formation of such complexes is usually associated with inhibition of c-Met or EGFR phosphorylation [36–38].”

    From Candida albicans stimulates formation of a multi-receptor complex that mediates epithelial cell invasion during oropharyngeal infection (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction reports that both c-Met and EGFR form complexes containing E-cadherin, and the EGFR/Neu results show reduced EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation under E-cadherin-mediated adhesion. However, the reported complexes and receptor-phosphorylation measurements are not in cancer cells. The tumor-cell results show attenuated EGF and HGF responses, not that c-Met/E-cadherin complex formation is associated with reduced c-Met phosphorylation; the Discussion describes the role of complex formation in regulation as a suggestion. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • E-cadherin itself was shown to interact with and regulate EGFR in vitro.

    “Along the same lines, E-cadherin itself was shown to interact with and regulate EGFR in vitro46–49.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yamazaki T, Zaal K, Hailey D, Presley J, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Samelson LE (2002) Role of Grb2 in EGF-stimulated EGFR inter- nalization. J Cell Sci 115: 1791-1802

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qian, X., Karpova, T., Sheppard, A. M., McNally, J., & Lowy, D. R.
Affiliations
National Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Lowy, Douglas R
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
1739-1748
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2037977870
Cited by
396
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 30
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
E-cadherin, receptor tyrosine kinase, ligand-dependent receptor activation, cell adhesion, EGFR, receptor mobility, ligand binding affinity, tumor suppressor, melanoma, breast cancer, receptor signaling regulation
MeSH terms
Delta Catenin, Animals, Cell Adhesion, Cell Line, Cell Membrane, Cytoskeletal Proteins, DNA, Dogs, Enzyme Activation, Epidermal Growth Factor, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Ligands, Mutation, Phosphoproteins, Transformation, Genetic, Trans-Activators, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Cadherins, Receptor, IGF Type 1, Receptor, ErbB-2, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Protein Transport, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, beta Catenin, Catenins, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review