Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lipids revert inert Aβ amyloid fibrils to neurotoxic protofibrils that affect learning in mice

Open access
Martins, Ivo Cristiano, Kuperstein, Inna, Wilkinson, Hannah, Maes, Elke, Vanbrabant, Mieke, Jonckheere, Wim, Van Gelder, Patrick, Hartmann, Dieter, D'Hooge, Rudi, De Strooper, Bart, Schymkowitz, Joost, Rousseau, Frederic·2008·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Although soluble oligomeric and protofibrillar assemblies of Abeta-amyloid peptide cause synaptotoxicity and potentially contribute to Alzheimer's disease (AD), the role of mature Abeta-fibrils in the amyloid plaques remains controversial. A widely held view in the field suggests that the fibrillization reaction proceeds 'forward' in a near-irreversible manner from the monomeric Abeta peptide through toxic protofibrillar intermediates, which subsequently mature into biologically inert amyloid fibrils that are found in plaques. Here, we show that natural lipids destabilize and rapidly resolubilize mature Abeta amyloid fibers. Interestingly, the equilibrium is not reversed toward monomeric Abeta but rather toward soluble amyloid protofibrils. We characterized these 'backward' Abeta protofibrils generated from mature Abeta fibers and compared them with previously identified 'forward' Abeta protofibrils obtained from the aggregation of fresh Abeta monomers. We find that backward protofibrils are biochemically and biophysically very similar to forward protofibrils: they consist of a wide range of molecular masses, are toxic to primary neurons and cause memory impairment and tau phosphorylation in mouse. In addition, they diffuse rapidly through the brain into areas relevant to AD. Our findings imply that amyloid plaques are potentially major sources of soluble toxic Abeta-aggregates that could readily be activated by exposure to biological lipids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601953

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Martins, I. C., Kuperstein, I., Wilkinson, H., Maes, E., Vanbrabant, M., Jonckheere, W., Van Gelder, P., Hartmann, D., D'Hooge, R., De Strooper, B., Schymkowitz, J., & Rousseau, F.
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2007-12-06
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
224-233
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W1981580199
Cited by
311
References
49
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lipids revert inert Aβ amyloid fibrils to neurotoxic protofibrils that affect learning in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601953
The paper
Martins, I. C., Kuperstein, I., Wilkinson, H., Maes, E., Vanbrabant, M., Jonckheere, W., Van Gelder, P., Hartmann, D., D'Hooge, R., De Strooper, B., Schymkowitz, J., & Rousseau, F. (2008). Lipids revert inert Aβ amyloid fibrils to neurotoxic protofibrils that affect learning in mice. The EMBO Journal. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601953

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.