Cited by 813Cell death mechanisms and regulationCancer-related Molecular PathwaysUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Human inhibitor of apoptosis proteins: why XIAP is the black sheep of the family

Open access
Eckelman, Brendan P, Salvesen, Guy S, Scott, Fiona L·2006·The EMBO Reports

Abstract

Several of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family members regulate apoptosis in response to various cellular assaults. Some members are also involved in cell signalling, mitosis and targeting proteins to the ubiquitin-proteasome degradation machinery. The most intensively studied family member, X-linked IAP (XIAP), is a potent inhibitor of caspase activity; hence, it is generally assumed that direct caspase inhibition is an important conserved function of most members of the family. Biochemical and structural studies have precisely mapped the elements of XIAP required for caspase inhibition. Intriguingly, these elements are not conserved among IAPs. Here, we review current knowledge of the caspase-inhibitory potential of the human IAPs and show that XIAP is probably the only bona fide caspase inhibitor, suggesting that the other family members never gained the ability to directly inhibit caspase activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.embor.7400795

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 813

Authors
Eckelman, B. P., Salvesen, G. S., & Scott, F. L.
Affiliations
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Scott, Fiona L
Venue
The EMBO Reports
Published
2006-10-01
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
988-994
ISSN
  • 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3178
OpenAlex
W2123123035
Cited by
813
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 65
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EMBO Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG15402, R01AG015402)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA077109, T32-CA77109)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, XIAP, caspase inhibition, apoptosis regulation, ubiquitin-proteasome degradation, signal transduction, mitosis
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Glutathione Transferase, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Genes, X-Linked, Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins, X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein, Caspase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review