Lentivirus-mediated gene transfer in primary T cells is enhanced by a central DNA flap
Abstract
Retroviral vectors have become the primary tool for gene delivery into hematopoietic cells, including T lymphocytes. Lentiviral vectors offer an advantage over Moloney murine leukemia virus (MuLV) vectors because of their ability to translocate across an intact nuclear membrane and integrate into the genome of nonproliferating cells. We have recently demonstrated that a central strand displacement event, controlled by the central polypurine tract (cPPT) and the central termination sequence (CTS), results in the formation of a central DNA flap which acts as a cis-determinant of HIV-1 genome nuclear import. Here, we show that insertion of this DNA determinant in a classical lentiviral vector resulted in a significantly higher level of transduction in activated T cells (51 +/- 12.7% versus 15 +/- 1.4%). CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells were transduced at equivalent levels. Importantly, freshly isolated T cells stimulated only during the 12-h transduction period could be efficiently transduced with this new flap-containing lentiviral vector, but not with the parental lentiviral vector nor an MuLV vector. Transgene expression in the flap-containing lentiviral vector, under the control of either an internal cytomegalovirus or the elongation factor-1 alpha (EF1 alpha) promoter, was significant and expression remained elevated in resting T cells. Thus, this system allows stable expression of transgenes in T lymphocytes following a short ex vivo transduction protocol.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Naïve T cells and Th17 cells cannot be efficiently transfected in vitro by traditional methods without altering their phenotype or function.
“naïve T cells and Th17 cells cannot be transfected effectively in vitro by traditional methods without changing their phenotype or function”
From Dynamic regulatory network controlling TH17 cell differentiation (2013) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Dardalhon, V, Herpers, B., Noraz, N., Pflumio, F., Guetard, D., Leveau, C., Dubart-Kupperschmitt, A., Charneau, P., & Taylor, N.
- Affiliations
- Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (FR)
- Inserm (FR)
- Institut Pasteur (FR)
- Venue
- Gene Therapy
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 190-198
- ISSN
- 0969-7128 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5462
- OpenAlex
- W1986115228
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
- Keywords
- lentiviral vectors, T cell transduction, transduction efficiency, activated T cells, ex vivo gene transfer, transgene expression, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, retroviral vectors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cell Division, DNA, Viral, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Lymphocyte Activation, Moloney murine leukemia virus, T-Lymphocytes, Transduction, Genetic, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Lentivirus, Gene Transfer Techniques, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Cell Culture Techniques, Transgenes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review