Cited by 93Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesMicrobial Inactivation MethodsRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Electroporation of immature and mature dendritic cells: implications for dendritic cell-based vaccines

Michiels, A, Tuyaerts, S, Bonehill, A, Corthals, J, Breckpot, K, Heirman, C, Van Meirvenne, S, Dullaers, M +4 more·2005·Gene Therapy

Abstract

Until now, studies utilizing mRNA electroporation as a tool for the delivery of tumor antigens to human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) have focused on DC electroporated in an immature state. Immature DC are considered to be specialized in antigen capture and processing, whereas mature DC present antigen and have an increased T-cell stimulatory capacity. Therefore, the consensus has been to electroporate DC before maturation. We show that the transfection efficiency of DC electroporated either before or after maturation was similarly high. Both immature and mature electroporated DC, matured in the presence of an inflammatory cytokine cocktail, expressed mature DC surface markers and preserved their capacity to secrete cytokines and chemokines upon CD40 ligation. In addition, both immature and mature DC can be efficiently cryopreserved before or after electroporation without deleterious effects on viability, phenotype or T-cell stimulatory capacity including in vitro antigen-specific T-cell activation. However, DC electroporated after maturation are more efficient in in vitro migration assays and at least as effective in antigen presentation as DC electroporated before maturation. These results are important for vaccination strategies where an optimal antigen presentation by DC after migration to the lymphoid organs is crucial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.gt.3302471

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michiels, A., Tuyaerts, S., Bonehill, A., Corthals, J., Breckpot, K., Heirman, C., Van Meirvenne, S., Dullaers, M., Allard, S., Brasseur, F., van der Bruggen, P., & Thielemans, K.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Ludwig Cancer Research (BE)
Venue
Gene Therapy
Published
2005-03-03
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
772-782
ISSN
  • 0969-7128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5462
OpenAlex
W2082730287
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
dendritic cells, electroporation, dendritic cell maturation, dendritic cell vaccine, mRNA delivery, tumor antigens, monocyte-derived dendritic cells, cryopreservation, antigen presentation, T cell activation, CD40 ligation, chemokine secretion, dendritic cell migration, transfection efficiency
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Cell Survival, Dendritic Cells, Humans, Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed, Lymphocyte Activation, RNA, Messenger, T-Lymphocytes, Transfection, Cryopreservation, Immunophenotyping, Cytokines, Antigen Presentation, Electroporation, Cancer Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review