Electroporation of immature and mature dendritic cells: implications for dendritic cell-based vaccines
Abstract
Until now, studies utilizing mRNA electroporation as a tool for the delivery of tumor antigens to human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) have focused on DC electroporated in an immature state. Immature DC are considered to be specialized in antigen capture and processing, whereas mature DC present antigen and have an increased T-cell stimulatory capacity. Therefore, the consensus has been to electroporate DC before maturation. We show that the transfection efficiency of DC electroporated either before or after maturation was similarly high. Both immature and mature electroporated DC, matured in the presence of an inflammatory cytokine cocktail, expressed mature DC surface markers and preserved their capacity to secrete cytokines and chemokines upon CD40 ligation. In addition, both immature and mature DC can be efficiently cryopreserved before or after electroporation without deleterious effects on viability, phenotype or T-cell stimulatory capacity including in vitro antigen-specific T-cell activation. However, DC electroporated after maturation are more efficient in in vitro migration assays and at least as effective in antigen presentation as DC electroporated before maturation. These results are important for vaccination strategies where an optimal antigen presentation by DC after migration to the lymphoid organs is crucial.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The gene of interest is used with its autochthonous noncoding regions or is flanked by the untranslated region of the human or Xenopus laevis beta-globin gene.
“The gene of interest is used with its autochthonous noncoding regions 12 or is flanked by the untranslated region (UTR) of the human or Xenopus laevis -globin gene.14”
From Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells (2006) · cites this paper as [14]
Vectors used currently for preclinical and clinical studies resort either to UTRs of β-globin or to autochthonous UTRs of the antigen they deliver, which are not further characterized in terms of their impact on RNA stability.
“Vectors used currently for preclinical and clinical studies resort either to UTRs of -globin 5,14,23 or to autochthonous UTRs of the antigen they want to deliver, 12 which are not further characterized in terms of their impact on RNA stability.”
From Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells (2006) · cites this paper as [14]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holtkamp, S., Kreiter, S., Selmi, A., Simon, P., Koslowski, M., Huber, C., Türeci, O., & Sahin, U. (2006) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2006-04-015024 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Kreiter, S., Selmi, A., Diken, M., Koslowski, M., Britten, C. M., Huber, C., Türeci, Ö., & Sahin, U. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0699 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Kuhn, A. N., Diken, M., Kreiter, S., Selmi, A., Kowalska, J., Jemielity, J., Darzynkiewicz, E., Huber, C., Türeci, Ö., & Sahin, U. (2010) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/gt.2010.52 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Establishing Preferred Product Characterization for the Evaluation of RNA Vaccine Antigens
Poveda, C., Biter, A. B., Bottazzi, M. E., & Strych, U. (2019) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines7040131 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- Michiels, A., Tuyaerts, S., Bonehill, A., Corthals, J., Breckpot, K., Heirman, C., Van Meirvenne, S., Dullaers, M., Allard, S., Brasseur, F., van der Bruggen, P., & Thielemans, K.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Ludwig Cancer Research (BE)
- Venue
- Gene Therapy
- Published
- 2005-03-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 772-782
- ISSN
- 0969-7128 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5462
- OpenAlex
- W2082730287
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Keywords
- dendritic cells, electroporation, dendritic cell maturation, dendritic cell vaccine, mRNA delivery, tumor antigens, monocyte-derived dendritic cells, cryopreservation, antigen presentation, T cell activation, CD40 ligation, chemokine secretion, dendritic cell migration, transfection efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Cell Differentiation, Cell Survival, Dendritic Cells, Humans, Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed, Lymphocyte Activation, RNA, Messenger, T-Lymphocytes, Transfection, Cryopreservation, Immunophenotyping, Cytokines, Antigen Presentation, Electroporation, Cancer Vaccines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review