Plasmid size up to 20 kbp does not limit effective in vivo lung gene transfer using compacted DNA nanoparticles
Abstract
Nanoparticles consisting of single molecules of DNA condensed with polyethylene glycol-substituted lysine 30-mers efficiently transfect lung epithelium following intrapulmonary administration. Nanoparticles formulated with lysine polymers having different counterions at the time of DNA mixing have distinct geometric shapes: trifluoroacetate or acetate counterions produce ellipsoids or rods, respectively. Based on intracytoplasmic microinjection studies, nanoparticle ellipsoids having a minimum diameter less than the 25 nm nuclear membrane pore efficiently transfect non-dividing cells. This 25 nm size restriction corresponds to a 5.8 kbp plasmid when compacted into spheroids, whereas the 8-11 nm diameter of rod-like particles is smaller than the nuclear pore diameter. In mice, up to 50% of lung cells are transfected after dosing with a rod-like compacted 6.9 kbp lacZ expression plasmid, and correction of the CFTR chloride channel was observed in humans following intranasal administration of a rod-like compacted 8.3 kbp plasmid. To further investigate the potential size and shape limitations of DNA nanoparticles for in vivo lung delivery, reporter gene activity of ellipsoidal and rod-like compacted luciferase plasmids ranging in size between 5.3 and 20.2 kbp was investigated. Equivalent molar reporter gene activities were observed for each formulation, indicating that microinjection size limitations do not apply to the in vivo gene transfer setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nanoparticles used for non-viral gene delivery can accommodate large sizes of plasmid DNA, are relatively safer and less immunogenic, maintain long-term protein expression, and carry no risk of insertional mutagenesis.
“The nanoparticles (NPs) that are used for such delivery can accommodate large sizes of the plasmid DNA, are relatively safer and less immunogenic, maintain long-term protein expression, and carry no risk of insertional mutagenesis [23].”
From The Ocular Gene Delivery Landscape (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 8 · Cited by 139
- Authors
- Fink, T. L., Klepcyk, P. J., Oette, S. M., Gedeon, C. R., Hyatt, S. L., Kowalczyk, T. H., Moen, R. C., & Cooper, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Copernicus Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cooper, M J
- ORCID
- Venue
- Gene Therapy
- Published
- 2006-03-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1048-1051
- ISSN
- 0969-7128 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5462
- OpenAlex
- W2002645517
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gene Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- DNA nanoparticles, plasmid size, intrapulmonary administration, nanoparticle morphology, intranasal gene delivery, non-dividing cells
- MeSH terms
- Cell Line, Cystic Fibrosis, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Luciferases, Lung, Plasmids, Transfection, Genetic Therapy, Gene Expression, Nanotechnology, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Nanostructures, Green Fluorescent Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review