Cited by 190Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Measurement of erectile dysfunction in population-based studies: the use of a single question self-assessment in the Massachusetts Male Aging Study

Derby, CA, Araujo, AB, Johannes, CB, Feldman, HA, McKinlay, JB·2000·International Journal of Impotence Research

Abstract

A concise, reliable means of assessing erectile dysfunction (ED) in large, multidisciplinary population-based studies is needed. A single, direct question for self-assessed ED was assessed in the population-based sample of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS). Of the 1156 respondents to the 1995-97 MMAS follow-up evaluation, 505 were randomly selected to complete either the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) (n = 254), or the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory (BMSFI) (n = 251), in addition to the single question self-assessment. The proportion not classified due to missing data was MMAS-9%, BMSFI-8%, and IIEF-18%. The single question correlated well with these other measures (r = 0.71-0.78, P < 0.001). Prevalence was similar to that based on the IIEF, agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.56-0.58), and associations with previously identified risk factors were similar for each classification. Thus, the MMAS single question may be a practical tool for population-based studies where detailed clinical measures of ED are impractical.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900542

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 190

Authors
Derby, C., Araujo, A., Johannes, C., Feldman, H., & McKinlay, J.
Affiliations
New England Research Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
Derby, CA
Venue
International Journal of Impotence Research
Published
2000-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
197-204
ISSN
  • 0955-9930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5489
OpenAlex
W2033842599
Cited by
190
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Impotence Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7p01ag004673-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 04673)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK044995, DK 44995-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, International Index of Erectile Function, measurement agreement, prevalence, risk factors, Massachusetts Male Aging Study, male sexual function
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Population, Self-Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review