Cited by 140Mercury impact and mitigation studiesIndigenous Health and EducationArsenic contamination and mitigation

Daily mercury intake in fish-eating populations in the Brazilian Amazon

Passos, Carlos José Sousa, Da Silva, Delaine Sampaio, Lemire, Mélanie, Fillion, Myriam, Guimarães, Jean Rémy Davée, Lucotte, Marc, Mergler, Donna·2008·Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology

Abstract

Although high levels of fish consumption and bioindicators of mercury exposure have been reported for traditional populations in the Amazon, little is known about their actual daily intake of Hg. Using an ecosystem approach, calculate daily mercury intake in adult fish-eaters, examine the relations between mercury intake and bioindicators of exposure and the factors that influence these relations. A cross-sectional dietary survey on fish and fruit consumption frequency was carried out with 256 persons from six villages of the Tapajós River. Fish portion per meal was determined. Mercury concentration was determined for 1123 local fish specimens. Daily mercury intake (microg/kg/day) was determined for men and women from each village using the average fish-mercury concentration for the fish caught in their fishing zone, the average quantity of fish per meal, fish-species frequency consumption and participants' body weight. Fish-mercury averaged 0.33 microg/g+/-0.33. Daily mercury intake varied between 0 and 11.8 microg/kg/day (mean 0.92 microg/kg/day+/-0.89) and varied by gender and village. Mean blood- and hair-mercury were 58.7+/-36.1 microg/l and 17.9+/-11.5 microg/g, respectively. There was a strong and positive relation between blood-mercury and daily mercury intake, with an inverse relation for fruit intake and schooling; significant variations were observed with immigrant status, and among villages. Hair-mercury was directly associated with daily mercury intake and invers…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.jes.7500599

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passos, C. J. S., Da Silva, D. S., Lemire, M., Fillion, M., Guimarães, J. R. D., Lucotte, M., & Mergler, D.
Affiliations
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Passos, Carlos José Sousa
Venue
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
Published
2007-09-05
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
76-87
ISSN
  • 1559-0631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-064X
OpenAlex
W2167280136
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Health and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Keywords
mercury intake, fish consumption, dietary exposure, blood mercury, hair mercury, fruit consumption, mercury in fish, Tapajós River, Amazonian populations, immigrant status, school education, reference dose, risk management
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Brazil, Data Collection, Environmental Monitoring, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Fishes, Food Contamination, Geography, Humans, Male, Mercury, Public Health, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review