Assessment of drug effects on blood pressure and pulse pressure using clinic, home and ambulatory measurements
Abstract
This study investigated the differences in the effect of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) compared with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) on blood pressure (BP) and pulse pressure (PP) measured in the clinic (CBP and CPP, respectively), at home (HBP, HPP) and with ambulatory monitoring (ABP, APP). Twenty-seven hypertensive patients were randomised to receive lisinopril (20 mg) or losartan (50 mg) for 5 weeks, and were subsequently crossed-over to the alternative treatment for a second 5-week period. Measurements of CBP, 24-h ABP and 5-days HBP were performed before randomisation and at the end of each treatment period. All measurement methods showed that lisinopril was more effective than losartan in reducing BP. However, the difference between the two drugs was demonstrated with greater precision using HBP (P<0.001) than 24-h ABP (P<0.01), whereas the poorest precision for demonstrating this difference was provided by CBP (P<0.05). Lisinopril was also found more effective than losartan in reducing HPP (P=0.01) and 24-h APP (P=0.03) whereas no such a difference was detected using measurements of CPP. It was concluded that the antihypertensive drugs may differ in their effects not only on BP, but also on PP. HBP monitoring appears to be as reliable as 24-h ABP monitoring in detecting differences in the effect of drugs on both BP and PP. Clinic measurements seem to be the least reliable method, particularly in the detection of differences in PP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is limited data for direct comparison of HBPM and ABPM.
“However, although there is limited data for direct comparison with HBPM [264,265].”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 35 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Stergiou, G., Efstathiou, S., Skeva, II, Baibas, N., Kalkana, C., & Mountokalakis, T.
- Affiliations
- Sotiria General Hospital (GR)
- Venue
- Journal of Human Hypertension
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 729-735
- ISSN
- 0950-9240 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5527
- OpenAlex
- W1991047425
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Hypertension (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
- Keywords
- blood pressure, pulse pressure, home blood pressure monitoring, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, clinic blood pressure measurement, lisinopril, losartan, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, antihypertensive drug comparison, hypertension, measurement reliability
- MeSH terms
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Office Visits, Pulse, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Lisinopril, Cross-Over Studies, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Losartan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review