Cited by 351Barrier Structure and Function StudiesAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Blood—Brain Barrier Permeability Precedes Senile Plaque Formation in an Alzheimer Disease Model

UJIIE, MAKI, DICKSTEIN, DARA L., CARLOW, DOUGLAS A., JEFFERIES, WILFRED A.·2003·Microcirculation

Abstract

Objective: To establish the generality of cerebrovascular pathology frequently observed with Alzheimer disease, we have assessed blood‐brain barrier (BBB) integrity using the Alzheimer disease model Tg2576 mice in which cognitive deficits and neuritic plaque formation develop around 10–12 months of age. Methods: We assessed BBB integrity using well‐established methods involving albumin and Evans blue uptake and introduce the use of a novel perfusion protocol using succinimidyl ester of carboxyfluorescein diacetate. Results: BBB permeability is increased in the cerebral cortex of 10‐month‐old Tg2576 mice preceding Alzheimer disease pathology presentation. Furthermore, when compared with their nontransgenic littermates, 4‐month‐old Tg2576 mice exhibit compromised BBB integrity in some areas of the cerebral cortex. An age‐related increase in albumin uptake by the brains of Tg2576 mice, compared with nontransgenic mice, was also observed. These findings were supported by quantitative Evans blue analysis (p = 0.07, two‐way analysis of variance). Conclusion: A breakdown of BBB was evident in young 4‐ to 10‐month‐old Tg2576 mice. Compromised barrier function could explain the mechanisms of Aβ entry into the brain observed in experimental Alzheimer disease vaccination models. Such structural changes to the BBB caused by elevated Aβ could play a central role in Alzheimer disease development and might define an early point of intervention for designing effective therapy against the disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.mn.7800212

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BBB disruption develops early in APP transgenic models carrying human ADAD mutations before Aβ accumulation, CAA, and behavioral deficits.

    “Additionally, laboratory studies tell us that BBB disruption develops early in APP transgenic models carrying human ADADmutations (467, 513, 606) before A 𝛃 accumulation, CAA, and behavioral deficits (151, 336, 606, 638)”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [606]

  • Progressive BBB breakdown develops early in APP Sw/0 mice beginning at 1-3 months of age before Aβ deposition, CAA, and behavioral memory recognition deficits that are observed beginning at 10-12 months of age.

    “Some studies in transgenic murine models have examined the temporal sequence of appearance of different pathologies, revealing that progressive BBB breakdown develops early in APP Sw/0 mice beginning at 1-3 mo of age (467, 513, 606) before A 𝛃 deposition, CAA, and behavioral memory recognition deficits that are observed beginning at 10-12 mo of age (151, 336, 606, 638).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [606]

  • Transgenic mice expressing different human APP mutations exhibit pronounced vascular pathology including severe BBB permeability changes, microbleeds, BBB leakages of blood-derived molecules, impaired Aβ clearance at the BBB, endothelial cell degeneration, loss of VSMCs and pericytes, and CAA.

    “Similar to humans, transgenic mice expressing different human APP mutations exhibit pronounced vascular pathology including severe BBB permeability changes (322, 467, 579, 606), microbleeds (56, 321, 322, 336, 579), BBB leakages of blood-derived molecules (109, 331, 336, 467, 513), impaired A 𝛃 clearance at the BBB (57, 137, 464, 512), endothelial cell degeneration (336, 513), loss of VSMCs (336,”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [606]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 28 · Cited by 351

Authors
UJIIE, M., DICKSTEIN, D. L., CARLOW, D. A., & JEFFERIES, W. A.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
JEFFERIES, WILFRED A.
Venue
Microcirculation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-12
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
463-470
ISSN
  • 1073-9688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-8719
OpenAlex
W2136838641
Cited by
351
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microcirculation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
blood-brain barrier permeability, Alzheimer's disease, Tg2576 mice, amyloid plaques, cerebral cortex, albumin uptake, Evans blue, amyloid-beta, cerebrovascular pathology
MeSH terms
Aging, Albumins, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Capillary Permeability, Cerebral Cortex, Disease Models, Animal, Evans Blue, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Time Factors, Animals, Genetically Modified, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review