NMDA receptor antagonists ketamine and PCP have direct effects on the dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2 receptors—implications for models of schizophrenia
Abstract
Ketamine and PCP are commonly used as selective NMDA receptor antagonists to model the putative hypoglutamate state of schizophrenia and to test new antipsychotics. Recent findings question the NMDA receptor selectivity of these agents. To examine this further, we measured the affinity of ketamine and PCP for the high-affinity states of the dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2) receptor and found that ketamine shows very similar affinity at the NMDA receptor and D(2) sites with a slightly lower affinity for 5-HT(2) (0.5 microM, 0.5 microM and 15 microM respectively), while PCP shows similar affinity for the NMDA and 5-HT(2) sites, with a slightly lower affinity for the D(2) site (2 microM, 5 microM and 37 microM respectively). Further, ketamine and PCP in clinically relevant doses caused a significant increase in the incorporation of [(35)S]GTP-gamma-S binding in CHO-cells expressing D(2) receptors, which was prevented by raclopride, suggesting a partial agonist effect at the D(2) receptor. Thus, ketamine and PCP may not produce a selective hypoglutamate state, but more likely produce a non-selective multi-system neurochemical perturbation via direct and indirect effects. These findings confound the inferences one can draw from the ketamine/PCP models of schizophrenia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ketamine showed high affinity for the human D2 receptor in CHO cells (0.5 μM, Ki = 55 μM) and the rat striatal 5-HT2 receptor (15 μM).
“a set of studies observed a high affinity of ketamine for the human D2 receptor expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (0.5 μM, Ki = 55 μM) and rat striatal 5-HT2 receptor (15 μM) (Kapur & Seeman, 2002; Seeman et al., 2005).”
From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Kapur & Seeman, 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 459
- Authors
- Kapur, S., & Seeman, P.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kapur, S
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2002-09-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 837-844
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- OpenAlex
- W1970328639
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- ketamine, phencyclidine, NMDA receptor antagonists, dopamine D2 receptor, 5-HT2 receptor, receptor binding affinity, animal models of schizophrenia, GTPgammaS binding, partial agonist activity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Ketamine, Nitroso Compounds, Phencyclidine, Radioligand Assay, Receptors, Serotonin, Schizophrenia, Sulfur Radioisotopes, Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate), Receptors, Dopamine D2, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review