Increased corticotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in monoamine-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men
Abstract
A number of clinical investigations and postmortem brain studies have provided evidence that excessive corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) secretion and neurotransmission is involved in the pathophysiology of depressive illness, and several studies have suggested that the hyperactivity in CRH neurotransmission extends beyond the hypothalamus involving several extra-hypothalamic brain regions. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that CRH levels are increased in specific brainstem regions of suicide victims with a diagnosis of major depression. Frozen tissue sections of the pons containing the locus coeruleus and caudal raphe nuclei from 11 matched pairs of depressed suicide and control male subjects were processed for radioimmunocytochemistry using a primary antiserum to CRH and a ([125])I-IgG secondary antibody. The optical density corresponding to the level of CRH-immunoreactivity (IR) was quantified in specific pontine regions from the film autoradiographic images. The level of CRH-IR was increased by 30% in the locus coeruleus, 39% in the median raphe and 45% in the caudal dorsal raphe in the depressed suicide subjects compared to controls. No difference in CRH-IR was found in the dorsal tegmentum or medial parabrachial nucleus between the subject groups. These findings reveal that CRH-IR levels are specifically increased in norepinephrine- and serotonin-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men, and thus they are consistent with the hypothesis…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher levels of CRF and CRF-expressing neurons are present in postmortem samples from depressed compared with nondepressed individuals.
“There are higher levels of both CRF and CRF-expressing neurons in postmortems samples from depressed compared with nondepressed individuals.49-51”
From Early life adversity and the epigenetic programming of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function (2014) · cites this paper as [49]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 56 · Cited by 162
- Authors
- Austin, M. C., Janosky, J. E., & Murphy, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Austin, M C
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 324-332
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- OpenAlex
- W2066760376
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH057011, MH 45156, MH 57011, P50MH045156)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- corticotropin-releasing factor, major depressive disorder, suicide, locus coeruleus, median raphe, pontine nuclei, norepinephrine, serotonin, brainstem
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Autoradiography, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Middle Aged, Synaptic Transmission, Norepinephrine, Pons, Raphe Nuclei, Serotonin, Suicide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review