Cited by 162Stress Responses and CortisolTreatment of Major DepressionNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Increased corticotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity in monoamine-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men

Austin, M C, Janosky, J E, Murphy, H A·2003·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

A number of clinical investigations and postmortem brain studies have provided evidence that excessive corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) secretion and neurotransmission is involved in the pathophysiology of depressive illness, and several studies have suggested that the hyperactivity in CRH neurotransmission extends beyond the hypothalamus involving several extra-hypothalamic brain regions. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that CRH levels are increased in specific brainstem regions of suicide victims with a diagnosis of major depression. Frozen tissue sections of the pons containing the locus coeruleus and caudal raphe nuclei from 11 matched pairs of depressed suicide and control male subjects were processed for radioimmunocytochemistry using a primary antiserum to CRH and a ([125])I-IgG secondary antibody. The optical density corresponding to the level of CRH-immunoreactivity (IR) was quantified in specific pontine regions from the film autoradiographic images. The level of CRH-IR was increased by 30% in the locus coeruleus, 39% in the median raphe and 45% in the caudal dorsal raphe in the depressed suicide subjects compared to controls. No difference in CRH-IR was found in the dorsal tegmentum or medial parabrachial nucleus between the subject groups. These findings reveal that CRH-IR levels are specifically increased in norepinephrine- and serotonin-containing pontine nuclei of depressed suicide men, and thus they are consistent with the hypothesis…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.mp.4001250

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 56 · Cited by 162

Authors
Austin, M. C., Janosky, J. E., & Murphy, H. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Austin, M C
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2003-03
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
324-332
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W2066760376
Cited by
162
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH057011, MH 45156, MH 57011, P50MH045156)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
corticotropin-releasing factor, major depressive disorder, suicide, locus coeruleus, median raphe, pontine nuclei, norepinephrine, serotonin, brainstem
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Autoradiography, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Middle Aged, Synaptic Transmission, Norepinephrine, Pons, Raphe Nuclei, Serotonin, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review