Cited by 273Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Progesterone selectively increases amygdala reactivity in women

Open access
van Wingen, G A, van Broekhoven, F, Verkes, R J, Petersson, K M, Bäckström, T, Buitelaar, J K, Fernández, G·2008·Molecular Psychiatry

Abstract

The acute neural effects of progesterone are mediated by its neuroactive metabolites allopregnanolone and pregnanolone. These neurosteroids potentiate the inhibitory actions of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Progesterone is known to produce anxiolytic effects in animals, but recent animal studies suggest that pregnanolone increases anxiety after a period of low allopregnanolone concentration. This effect is potentially mediated by the amygdala and related to the negative mood symptoms in humans that are observed during increased allopregnanolone levels. Therefore, we investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) whether a single progesterone administration to healthy young women in their follicular phase modulates the amygdala response to salient, biologically relevant stimuli. The progesterone administration increased the plasma concentrations of progesterone and allopregnanolone to levels that are reached during the luteal phase and early pregnancy. The imaging results show that progesterone selectively increased amygdala reactivity. Furthermore, functional connectivity analyses indicate that progesterone modulated functional coupling of the amygdala with distant brain regions. These results reveal a neural mechanism by which progesterone may mediate adverse effects on anxiety and mood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.mp.4002030

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Progesterone and its neurosteroid metabolites, which rise and begin to fluctuate during puberty, upregulate social behaviors, increase social threat monitoring, and regulate the HPA axis.

    “Progesterone and its neurosteroid metabolites, which rise and begin to fluctuate during puberty, upregulate social behaviors [40], increase social threat monitoring [41,42], and regulate the HPA axis [43].”

    From HPA axis response and psychosocial stress as interactive predictors of suicidal ideation and behavior in adolescent females: a multilevel diathesis-stress framework (2018) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results report that progesterone increased amygdala responses during a task using angry and fearful faces, which is relevant to social threat processing. But the Behavioral task section says the contrast measures a general response to salient stimuli, not an emotion-specific effect; the study did not measure social threat monitoring itself. The citation is attached to that clause, not to the separate claims about puberty, social behavior, or the HPA axis. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 273

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]12. Smith SS, Gong QH, Hsu FC, Markowitz RS, ffrench-Mullen JM, Li X. GABA(A) receptor alpha4 subunit suppression prevents with- drawal properties of an endogenous steroid. Nature 1998; 392: 926-930.

Authors
van Wingen, G. A., van Broekhoven, F., Verkes, R. J., Petersson, K. M., Bäckström, T., Buitelaar, J. K., & Fernández, G.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University Hospital of Umeå (SE)
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2007-06-19
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
325-333
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W2112445335
Cited by
273
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Radboud Universiteit
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
progesterone, allopregnanolone, pregnanolone, neurosteroids, amygdala reactivity, anxiety, mood, functional connectivity, women, follicular phase, GABAergic inhibition
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Menstrual Cycle, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Progestins, Progesterone, Psychomotor Performance, Radioimmunoassay, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review