The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellular Dynamics of EGF Receptor–Targeted Synthetic Viruses
Open accessAbstract
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed on a high percentage of human carcinomas. EGFR is an attractive therapeutic target for tissue-specific targeting by non-viral vectors in cancer gene therapy. In this study we analyzed and compared the effects of EGFR-targeted and untargeted polyplexes in respect to internalization into EGFR overexpressing HuH7 cells. Uptake kinetics and internalization dynamics were evaluated by flow cytometry and single-particle tracking. Our results clearly show that EGFR targeting leads to faster and more efficient internalization compared with untargeted particles. After 5 minutes 50% of the EGFR-targeted polyplexes were internalized, whereas untargeted polyplexes reached only approximately 20% internalization even after 20 minutes. In addition, single-particle tracking revealed a three-phase dynamics of the internalization process, and this was generally observed for polyplexes independent of targeting. Phase I was characterized by slow, actin cytoskeleton-mediated movement of the particles with drift, and included the internalization process. During phase II particles displayed increased velocities with normal and confined diffusion in the cytoplasm. Phase III was characterized by fast active transport along microtubules. Targeting of polyplexes for receptor-mediated endocytosis by the EGFR resulted in shortening of phase I and strongly accelerated internalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ogris, M., Brunner, S., Schüller, S., Kircheis, R., & Wagner, E. (1999) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3300900 · Cited by 1,178
Self-citation
Cited by
Engineered Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy
Sun, T., Zhang, Y. S., Pang, B., Hyun, D. C., Yang, M., & Xia, Y. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201403036 · Cited by 2,164
Anomalous transport in the crowded world of biological cells
Höfling, F., & Franosch, T. (2013) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/4/046602 · Cited by 1,247
Nucleic Acid Therapeutics Using Polyplexes: A Journey of 50 Years (and Beyond)
Lächelt, U., & Wagner, E. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5006793 · Cited by 600
Self-citationExosomes: Mechanisms of Uptake
McKelvey, K. J., Powell, K. L., Ashton, A. W., Morris, J. M., & McCracken, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Circulating Biomarkers · doi:10.5772/61186 · Cited by 416
Does a targeting ligand influence nanoparticle tumor localization or uptake?
Pirollo, K. F., & Chang, E. H. (2008) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.06.007 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- de Bruin, K., Ruthardt, N., von Gersdorff, K., Bausinger, R., Wagner, E., Ogris, M., & Bräuchle, C.
- Venue
- Molecular Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1297-1305
- ISSN
- 1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062940443
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular Dynamics of EGF Receptor–Targeted Synthetic Viruses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.mt.6300176
- The paper
- de Bruin, K., Ruthardt, N., von Gersdorff, K., Bausinger, R., Wagner, E., Ogris, M., & Bräuchle, C. (2007). Cellular Dynamics of EGF Receptor–Targeted Synthetic Viruses. Molecular Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mt.6300176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.