The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid and Quantitative Assessment of Cancer Treatment Response Using In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Current assessment of orthotopic tumor models in animals utilizes survival as the primary therapeutic end point. In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) is a sensitive imaging modality that is rapid and accessible, and may comprise an ideal tool for evaluating antineoplastic therapies. Using human tumor cell lines constitutively expressing luciferase, the kinetics of tumor growth and response to therapy have been assessed in intraperitoneal, and subcutaneous, and intravascular cancer models. However, use of this approach for evaluating orthotopic tumor models has not been demonstrated. In this report, the ability of BLI to noninvasively quantitate the growth and therapeutic-induced cell kill of orthotopic rat brain tumors derived from 9L gliosarcoma cells genetically engineered to stably express firefly luciferase (9LLuc) was investigated. Intracerebral tumor burden was monitored over time by quantitation of photon emission and tumor volume using a cryogenically cooled CCD camera and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), respectively. There was excellent correlation (r=0.91) between detected photons and tumor volume. A quantitative comparison of tumor cell kill determined from serial MRI volume measurements and BLI photon counts following 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) treatment revealed that both imaging modalities yielded statistically similar cell kill values (P=.951). These results provide direct validation of BLI imaging as a powerful and quantitative tool for the assessment of antineoplastic therapies in living animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging of Gene Expression
Contag, C. H., & Bachmann, M. H. (2002) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.111901.093336 · Cited by 870
Self-citationLiang, G., Zhu, Y., Ali, D. J., Tian, T., Xu, H., Si, K., Sun, B., Chen, B., & Xiao, Z. (2020) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-019-0563-2 · Cited by 619
A small-molecule antagonist of CXCR4 inhibits intracranial growth of primary brain tumors
Rubin, J. B., Kung, A. L., Klein, R. S., Chan, J. A., Sun, Y., Schmidt, K., Kieran, M. W., Luster, A. D., & Segal, R. A. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2235846100 · Cited by 615
Hu-Lieskovan, S., Heidel, J. D., Bartlett, D. W., Davis, M. E., & Triche, T. J. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0565 · Cited by 567
Troy, T., Jekic-McMullen, D., Sambucetti, L., & Rice, B. (2004) · Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1162/153535004773861688 · Cited by 418
Metadata
- Authors
- Rehemtulla, A., Stegman, L. D., Cardozo, S. J., Gupta, S., Hall, D. E., Contag, C. H., & Ross, B. D.
- Venue
- Neoplasia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 491-495
- ISSN
- 1476-5586 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094868914
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid and Quantitative Assessment of Cancer Treatment Response Using In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.neo.7900121
- The paper
- Rehemtulla, A., Stegman, L. D., Cardozo, S. J., Gupta, S., Hall, D. E., Contag, C. H., & Ross, B. D. (2000). Rapid and Quantitative Assessment of Cancer Treatment Response Using In Vivo Bioluminescence Imaging. Neoplasia. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.