Cited by 521Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Differential Brain Activity in Alcoholics and Social Drinkers to Alcohol Cues: Relationship to Craving

Myrick, Hugh, Anton, Raymond F, Li, Xingbao, Henderson, Scott, Drobes, David, Voronin, Konstantin, George, Mark S·2004·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Using fMRI, our group previously found that after a sip of alcohol and exposure to alcohol beverage pictures, alcoholics compared to social drinkers had increased differential brain activity in the prefrontal cortex and anterior thalamus. This study extends this earlier work with several improvements including imaging the entire brain (rather than the anterior half previously) and recording craving, while the subjects viewed images within the scanner. In a Philips 1.5 T MRI scanner, 10 nontreatment-seeking alcoholics and 10 age-matched healthy social drinkers were given a sip of alcohol before viewing a 12 min randomized presentation of pictures of alcoholic beverages, nonalcoholic beverages, and two different visual control tasks. During picture presentation, changes in regional brain activity were measured in 15 transverse T2(*)-weighted blood oxygen level dependent slices. Subjects rated their urge to drink after each picture sequence. After a sip of alcohol, while viewing alcohol cues compared to viewing other beverage cues, the alcoholics, but not social drinkers, reported higher craving ratings and had increased activity in the prefrontal cortex and anterior limbic regions. Brain activity in the left nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate, and left orbitofrontal cortex significantly correlated with subjective craving ratings in alcohol subjects but not in control subjects. This study suggests, as did our earlier study, that alcoholics and not social drinkers, when expose…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300295

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 521

Authors
Myrick, H., Anton, R. F., Li, X., Henderson, S., Drobes, D., Voronin, K., & George, M. S.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Myrick, Hugh
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2003-12-12
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
393-402
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2076432816
Cited by
521
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 29
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA 10761, K23 AA00314, P50 AA 10761, K23AA000314, 2 P50 AA10761-03, P50AA010761)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
alcoholism, alcohol craving, alcohol cues, prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, limbic system, social drinkers, brain activity
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholic Beverages, Alcoholism, Analysis of Variance, Beverages, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cues, Demography, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Photic Stimulation, Rest, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review