Cited by 96Circadian rhythm and melatoninBipolar Disorder and TreatmentNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Lithium- and Valproate-Induced Alterations in Circadian Locomotor Behavior in Drosophila

Dokucu, Mehmet E, Yu, Liangping, Taghert, Paul H·2005·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Lithium and valproate are commonly used mood stabilizers, but their action pathways are not clearly understood. They also suffer from multiple toxic effects that limit their utility. Elucidating their action mechanisms could lead to newer agents and better understanding of the etiopathogenesis of bipolar disorder. We have expanded the study of signaling mechanisms of lithium and valproate by using Drosophila circadian locomotor activity as a robust behavioral assay that is amenable to genetic manipulations. We demonstrate that lithium affects the circadian system of Drosophila similarly to what has been reported in the mammalian studies. We show that lithium and valproate share effects on the circadian locomotor activity of Drosophila: they lengthen the period of circadian rhythms and increase arrhythmicity. Valproate exerts these effects in a weaker fashion than does lithium. We also tested the circadian alterations in multiple mutant lines of Drosophila bearing defects in the GSK-3beta gene and other clock genes in response to lithium administration. We show that lithium partially rescues the shortening of circadian period when the GSK-3beta gene is overexpressed only in specific circadian pacemaker neurons, thus implicating GSK-3beta as a component in lithium's effect on the circadian oscillator. Moreover, lithium also lengthens the period in GSK-3beta heterozygous mutants and doubletime long mutants. These results establish a basis for using Drosophila genetics to investigate more fully lithium and valproate action mechanisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300764

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 96

Authors
Dokucu, M. E., Yu, L., & Taghert, P. H.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Dokucu, Mehmet E
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
2216-2224
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W1982469223
Cited by
96
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH067122)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008151)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
lithium, valproic acid, mood stabilizers, circadian rhythm, locomotor activity, Drosophila, GSK3β, circadian period, arrhythmicity, circadian pacemaker neurons, clock genes, bipolar disorder, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drosophila, Lithium, Motor Activity, Valproic Acid, Antimanic Agents, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review