Anxiety and Hippocampus Volume in the Rat
Abstract
In depressed patients as well as healthy controls, a positive relationship between hippocampal volume and trait anxiety has been reported. This study sought to explore the possible inter-relation between hippocampal volume and trait anxiety further. Magnetic resonance imaging at 7 T was used to measure hippocampal volumes in a rat model of extremes in trait anxiety (experiment 1) and in a Wistar population with normal anxiety-related behavior (experiment 2). In addition to anxiety-related behavior, potentially confounding factors (depression-like, exploratory, and locomotor behavior) were assessed. Experiment 1 globally supported the hypothesis of a positive relationship between hippocampus volume and trait anxiety but did not allow for ruling out possible confounds arising from cosegregation of other behavioral traits. Experiment 2 yielded strong evidence for a negative relationship which was specific for trait anxiety. Thus, the relationship between hippocampal volume and anxiety may be more complex than expected. Interestingly, anxiety-related behavior in experiment 2 had a stronger influence on hippocampal volume than depression-like behavior. In the light of hippocampal volume loss in anxiety disorder and frequent comorbidity of anxiety and depression, this finding suggests that further research into the relationship between anxiety and hippocampal volume may be critical for understanding hippocampal contributions to normal and pathological behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies in rodents have shown that lesions to the hippocampus impact anxiety behaviors, including hyponeophagia.
“Furthermore, studies in rodents have shown that lesions to the hippocampus impact anxiety behaviors, including hyponeophagia (Bannerman et al, 2003, 2004; McHugh et al, 2004, 2011; Kalisch et al, 2006).”
From Divergent Functional Effects of Sazetidine-A and Varenicline During Nicotine Withdrawal (2013) · cites this paper as Kalisch et al, 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Kalisch, R., Schubert, M., Jacob, W., Keßler, M. S., Hemauer, R., Wigger, A., Landgraf, R., & Auer, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Venue
- Neuropsychopharmacology
- Published
- 2005-09-28
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 925-932
- ISSN
- 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
- 1740-634X
- OpenAlex
- W1965694825
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- hippocampal volume, trait anxiety, anxiety-like behavior, depression-like behavior, hippocampal atrophy, anxiety disorders, comorbid depression, rat model, exploratory behavior, locomotor behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Atrophy, Depressive Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Hippocampus, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review