CSF Corticotropin-Releasing Factor in Personality Disorder: Relationship with Self-Reported Parental Care
Abstract
This cross-sectional investigation tests the relationship between the level of self-reported childhood parental care and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) concentration in adults with and without personality disorder (PD). Based on preclinical models of the lasting effect of post-natal parental care on central CRF function, the primary hypothesis was that childhood parental care, as reflected by the parental bonding inventory (PBI) care and involvement subscale, is inversely correlated with adult CSF CRF levels. The sample includes cerebrospinal fluid CRF samples from 19 subjects who were included in a previously published report on the relationship between CRF level and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire score. Parental bonding was measured retrospectively with the PBI in 54 medication-free male and female subjects, 37 of whom were diagnosed with a DSM-IV PD, 17 of whom were normal controls free of Axis I and II psychopathology. CSF CRF level as measured by lumbar puncture was entered into a model as the dependent variable, with the independent variables of PBI Parental Care and Involvement, diagnostic category, age, and gender. The model predicting CSF CRF level was significant, with PBI parental care and involvement negatively correlated with CSF CRF level. PD subjects with higher than median PBI parental care and involvement score had significantly lower CSF CRF levels than both normal controls and PD subjects with lower than median PBI parental c…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elevated CSF levels of CRF in adults associate with a history of childhood maltreatment, poor quality of parental care, and childhood stressful experience.
“Elevated CSF levels of CRF in adults associate with a history of childhood maltreatment,58,59 a poor quality of parental care,60 and childhood stressful experience.61”
From Early life adversity and the epigenetic programming of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function (2014) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Lee, R. J., Gollan, J., Kasckow, J., Geracioti, T., & Coccaro, E. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Royce J
- Venue
- Neuropsychopharmacology
- Published
- 2006-07-26
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2289-2295
- ISSN
- 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
- 1740-634X
- OpenAlex
- W2022201875
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 17 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k02mh000951-12, 1r03mh066888-01a1)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1R03MH066888-01, K02MH00951, R01MH046948, R01 MH 46948)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- corticotropin-releasing factor, cerebrospinal fluid, personality disorders, parental care, parental bonding, childhood trauma, stress reactivity, neuroendocrine stress response
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review