Cited by 392Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Pharmacological evidence for a motivational role of κ-opioid systems in ethanol dependence

Open access
Walker, Brendan M, Koob, George F·2008·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that activation of the dynorphin/kappa (kappa)-opioid system has a role in the increased consumption of ethanol in dependent animals. The effects of three opioid receptor antagonists with different effects on opioid receptors, naltrexone, nalmefene, and nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), were compared in their ability to decrease ethanol self-administration in nondependent and ethanol-dependent male Wistar rats. Nalmefene and naltrexone are both opioid receptor ligands with comparable molecular weights and pharmacokinetic profiles, but differing specificity for the three opioid receptor subtypes at low doses, while nor-BNI is a selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist. Dependence was induced in half the animals by subjecting them to a 4-week intermittent vapor exposure period in which animals were exposed to ethanol vapor for 14 h per day. Subsequent to dependence induction, nalmefene, naltrexone, and nor-BNI were tested for their ability to modulate self-administration of ethanol in vapor-exposed and control rats. The results indicated that both nalmefene and naltrexone induced a significant dose-dependent decrease in the number of lever presses for ethanol in both groups of animals. However, in ethanol-dependent animals, nalmefene was significantly more effective in suppressing ethanol intake than naltrexone. Nor-BNI selectively attenuated ethanol-dependent self-administration while leaving nondependent ethanol self-administration intact. Because naltrexone is primarily selective for the mu-opioid receptor, and nalmefene is primarily selective for the mu- and kappa-opioid receptor subtypes, the fact that nalmefene demonstrates more suppression in dependent animals suggests that opioid systems distinct from the mu-regulated portion may be involved in the increased drinking seen during withdrawal in dependent animals. The results with nor-BNI confirm that kappa-opioid receptor antagonism selectively decreases dependence-induced ethanol self-administration, which supports the hypothesis that dynorphin/kappa-opioid systems are dysregulated in dependence and contribute to the increased drinking seen during acute withdrawal in dependent rats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1301438

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • κ opioid receptor antagonists injected into the nucleus accumbens shell block the development of compulsive drug seeking.

    “Equally compelling, κ opioid receptor antagonists, when injected into the nucleus accumbens shell, can block the development of compulsive drug seeking (tables 1, 2, circuit 8).”

    From Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Drugs section says the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI was injected into the lateral ventricles, not the nucleus accumbens shell. The Nor-Binaltorphimine results report reduced ethanol self-administration in dependent rats during withdrawal, not prevention of the development of compulsive drug seeking. The claim captures an effect of κ-opioid antagonism on drug-related responding but changes both the injection site and the outcome. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Systemic and intracerebral k-opioid receptor antagonist administration blocks high compulsive-like drug intake associated with extended access to and dependence on alcohol.

    “Both systemic and intracerebral k-opioid receptor antagonist administration blocked high compulsivelike drug intake that was associated with extended access to and dependence on alcohol (Hölter et al., 2000;Walker and Koob, 2008).”

    From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Walker and Koob, 2008

    The Drugs and Results sections report that systemic nalmefene reduced ethanol self-administration and intracerebral nor-BNI selectively reduced it in ethanol-dependent rats. But nalmefene is not a selective κ-opioid antagonist, and the study reports reduced—not completely blocked—intake after ethanol-vapor-induced dependence. It does not establish the claimed effect under extended-access drinking conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • During withdrawal, this up-regulation and subsequent activation of KOR may contribute to negative affect and thus promote relapse.

    “During withdrawal, this up-regulation and subsequent activation of KOR may contribute to negative affect and thus promote relapse (Przewlocka et al 1997; Simonin et al 1998; Walker and Koob 2008).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 392

Authors
Walker, B. M., & Koob, G. F.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2007-05-02
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
643-652
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W1963557453
Cited by
392
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 26
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA012602, F32AA014723, AA 014723, R01AA012602)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
ethanol dependence, kappa opioid receptor, dynorphin, naltrexone, nalmefene, nor-binaltorphimine, ethanol self-administration, opioid antagonists, ethanol vapor exposure, mu-opioid receptor, alcoholism
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Ethanol, Alcoholism, Animals, Central Nervous System Depressants, Conditioning, Operant, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Dynorphins, Injections, Intraventricular, Male, Motivation, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Self Administration, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Receptors, Opioid, delta, Receptors, Opioid, kappa, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review