Cited by 151Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysDNA Repair MechanismsHeat shock proteins research

DNA damage induced p53 stabilization: no indication for an involvement of p53 phosphorylation

Blattner, Christine, Tobiasch, Edda, Litfen, Margarethe, Rahmsdorf, Hans J, Herrlich, Peter·1999·Oncogene

Abstract

Abundance and activity of p53 are predominantly regulated posttranslationally. Structural disturbance in transcribed genes induced by radiation, e.g. DNA damage, or by transcriptional inhibitors cause p53 protein stabilization by a yet unknown mechanism. Using stable and transient transfections for the analysis of p53 mutant proteins, we have ruled out a role in stabilization by UV, gamma irradiation or actinomycin C for the following putative phosphorylation sites in the p53 protein: serines 6, 9, 15, 33, 315 and 392, and threonine 18. By double mutation combinations of phosphorylations were also ruled out; 6,9; 15,18; 15,37. These mutations eliminate modifications by casein kinases I and II, DNA-PK, ATM, CDK and JNK. Also the 30 carboxyterminal amino acids are not required for induced p53 stabilization. Thus neither phosphorylations of individual amino acids nor interactions of the carboxyterminus of p53 with cellular macromolecules appear to play a role in the stabilization process. The only single prerequisite for induced stabilization of p53 is its prior destabilization by Mdm2. However, the level of active Mdm2 must be controlled carefully: overexpression of Mdm2 inhibits UV induced p53 stabilization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1202480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutation of multiple p53 phosphorylation sites including S15 and S20 did not abrogate p53 stabilization after DNA damage in cell culture.

    “Mutation of multiple phosphorylation sites including S15 and S20 did not abrogate p53 stabilization after DNA damage in cell culture (Ashcroft et al, 1999;Blattner et al, 1999;Dumaz and Meek, 1999).”

    From ATM activates p53 by regulating MDM2 oligomerization and E3 processivity (2009) · cites this paper as Blattner et al, 1999

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 151

Authors
Blattner, C., Tobiasch, E., Litfen, M., Rahmsdorf, H. J., & Herrlich, P.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
Oncogene
Published
1999-03-04
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1723-1732
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2330189712
Cited by
151
References
67
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
Keywords
p53 stabilization, DNA damage, p53 phosphorylation, MDM2, post-translational regulation, casein kinase 1, casein kinase 2, DNA-dependent protein kinase, ATM, cyclin-dependent kinases, JNK, UV irradiation, gamma irradiation, actinomycin C, transcription inhibitors, mutant p53
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, DNA Damage, Gene Expression Regulation, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Transfection, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, 3T3 Cells, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review