Cited by 113Effects of Radiation ExposureDNA Repair MechanismsGene expression and cancer classification

Identification of radiation-specific responses from gene expression profile

Open access
Park, Woong-Yang, Hwang, Chang-Il, Im, Chang-Nim, Kang, Min-Ji, Woo, Jang-Hee, Kim, Ju-Hoon, Kim, Yon Su, Kim, Ju-Han +6 more·2002·Oncogene

Abstract

The responses to ionizing radiation (IR) in tumors are dependent on cellular context. We investigated radiation-related expression patterns in Jurkat T cells with nonsense mutation in p53 using cDNA microarray. Expression of 2400 genes in gamma-irradiated cells was distinct from other stimulations like anti-CD3, phetohemagglutinin (PHA) and concanavalin A (ConA) in unsupervised clustering analysis. Among them, 384 genes were selected for their IR-specific changes to make 'RadChip'. In spite of p53 status, every type of cells showed similar patterns in expression of these genes upon gamma-radiation. Moreover, radiation-induced responses were clearly separated from the responses to other genotoxic stress like UV radiation, cisplatin and doxorubicin. We focused on two IR-related genes, phospholipase Cgamma2 (PLCG2) and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase (EPHX2), which were increased at 12 h after gamma-radiation in RT-PCR. TPCK could suppress the induction of these two genes in either of Jurkat T cells and PBMCs, which might suggest the transcriptional regulation of PLCG2 and EPHX2 by NF-kappaB upon gamma-radiation. From these results, we could identify the IR-specific genes from expression profiling, which can be used as radiation biomarkers to screen radiation exposure as well as probing the mechanism of cellular responses to ionizing radiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1205977

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLCγ2 was noted as a potential biomarker of radiation exposure through its upregulation after ionizing radiation.

    “PLCγ2 as was also noted as a potential biomarker of radiation exposure through its upregulation after ionizing radiation (158).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, W.-Y., Hwang, C.-I., Im, C.-N., Kang, M.-J., Woo, J.-H., Kim, J.-H., Kim, Y. S., Kim, J.-H., Kim, H., Kim, K.-A., Yu, H.-J., Lee, S.-J., Lee, Y.-S., & Seo, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Macrogen (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
Seo, Jeong-Sun
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2002-12-04
Volume
21
Issue
55
Pages
8521-8528
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2167004083
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
ionizing radiation response, gene expression profiling, gamma irradiation, Jurkat cells, PLCγ2, EPHX2, NF-κB, TPCK, radiation biomarkers, genotoxic stress, T cell activation
MeSH terms
Cell Division, Concanavalin A, Humans, Phytohemagglutinins, Radiation, Ionizing, T-Lymphocytes, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Apoptosis, CD3 Complex, Jurkat Cells, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review