Cited by 102DNA Repair MechanismsEffects of Radiation ExposureGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

The mammalian mismatch repair protein MSH2 is required for correct MRE11 and RAD51 relocalization and for efficient cell cycle arrest induced by ionizing radiation in G2 phase

Franchitto, Annapaola, Pichierri, Pietro, Piergentili, Rita, Crescenzi, Marco, Bignami, Margherita, Palitti, Fabrizio·2003·Oncogene

Abstract

In yeast, MSH2 plays an important role in mismatch repair (MMR) and recombination, whereas the function of the mammalian MSH2 protein in recombinational repair is not completely established. We examined the cellular responses of MSH2-deficient mouse cells to X-rays to clarify the role of MSH2 in recombinational repair. Cell survival, checkpoint functions and relocalization of the recombination-related proteins MRE11 and RAD51 were analysed in embryonic fibroblasts derived from MSH2(+/+) and MSH2(-/-) mice, and in MSH2-proficient and deficient mouse colorectal carcinoma cells. Loss of MSH2 function was found to be associated with reduction in cell survival following radiation, absence of either MRE11 or RAD51 relocalization and a higher level of X-ray-induced chromosomal damage specifically in G2-phase cells. Finally, MSH2(-/-) cells showed an inefficient early G2/M checkpoint, being arrested only transiently after irradiation before progressing into mitosis. Consistent with the premature release from the G2-phase arrest, activation of CHK1 was transient and CHK2 was not phosphorylated in synchronized MSH2-null cells. Our data suggest that an active MSH2 is required for a correct response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, possibly connecting DSB repair to checkpoint signalling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1206254

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 102

Authors
Franchitto, A., Pichierri, P., Piergentili, R., Crescenzi, M., Bignami, M., & Palitti, F.
Affiliations
  • Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
Corresponding author
Palitti, Fabrizio
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2003-04-10
Volume
22
Issue
14
Pages
2110-2120
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2011139344
Cited by
102
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
MSH2, DNA mismatch repair, MRE11, RAD51, ionizing radiation, G2/M checkpoint, DNA double-strand break repair, recombinational repair, Chk1 phosphorylation, Chk2, cell cycle arrest, colorectal cancer cells, embryonic fibroblasts, DNA damage response
MeSH terms
MRE11 Homologue Protein, Animals, Cell Cycle, Cell Line, Chromatids, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, G2 Phase, DNA Repair Enzymes, Rad51 Recombinase, Mice, MutS Homolog 2 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review