Cited by 48Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysHeat shock proteins researchPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

Cooperativity of p19ARF, Mdm2, and p53 in murine tumorigenesis

Moore, Lynette, Venkatachalam, Sundaresan, Vogel, Hannes, Watt, Julie C, Wu, Chao-Ling, Steinman, Heather, Jones, Stephen N, Donehower, Lawrence A·2003·Oncogene

Abstract

The p19ARF gene product responds to oncogenic stresses by interfering with the inhibitory effects of Mdm2 on p53, thus enhancing p53 activity and its antiproliferative functions. The absence of p19ARF in the mouse leads to early tumor susceptibility, presumably in part due to decreased p53 activity. To examine the tumorigenic cooperativity of p19ARF, Mdm2, and p53 in vivo, p19ARF-deficient mice were crossed first to p53-deficient mice and then to Mdm2 transgenic mice. The progeny were monitored for tumors. Cooperativity between p19ARF and p53 deficiencies in accelerating tumor formation was observed for most genotypes except p53-/- p19ARF-/- mice. p53-/- p19ARF-/- mice had a tumor incidence similar to p53-/- mice. In this context, tumor suppression by ARF appears to be primarily p53 dependent. The majority of the p19ARF+/- tumors deleted the wildtype p19ARF allele, in agreement with the previous studies, suggesting that p19ARF is a classic 'two hit' tumor suppressor. In a p53+/- background, however, all p19ARF+/- tumors retained a wildtype ARF allele and most also retained wildtype p53. In the second cross between p19ARF-deficient and Mdm2 transgenic mice, cooperativity in tumor incidence between Mdm2 overexpression and ARF deficiency was observed, consistent with the role of p19ARF in negatively regulating Mdm2 activity. These experiments further demonstrate in vivo the inter-relationships of the p19ARF-Mdm2-p53 signaling axis in tumor suppression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1206985

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 48

Authors
Moore, L., Venkatachalam, S., Vogel, H., Watt, J. C., Wu, C.-L., Steinman, H., Jones, S. N., & Donehower, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Donehower, Lawrence A
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2003-10-30
Volume
22
Issue
49
Pages
7831-7837
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2140529820
Cited by
48
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
p19ARF, MDM2, p53, tumor suppression, carcinogenesis, MDM2 overexpression, p53-deficient mice, oncogenic stress
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Genotype, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neoplasms, Experimental, Nuclear Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Tumor Suppressor Protein p14ARF, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review