Cooperativity of p19ARF, Mdm2, and p53 in murine tumorigenesis
Abstract
The p19ARF gene product responds to oncogenic stresses by interfering with the inhibitory effects of Mdm2 on p53, thus enhancing p53 activity and its antiproliferative functions. The absence of p19ARF in the mouse leads to early tumor susceptibility, presumably in part due to decreased p53 activity. To examine the tumorigenic cooperativity of p19ARF, Mdm2, and p53 in vivo, p19ARF-deficient mice were crossed first to p53-deficient mice and then to Mdm2 transgenic mice. The progeny were monitored for tumors. Cooperativity between p19ARF and p53 deficiencies in accelerating tumor formation was observed for most genotypes except p53-/- p19ARF-/- mice. p53-/- p19ARF-/- mice had a tumor incidence similar to p53-/- mice. In this context, tumor suppression by ARF appears to be primarily p53 dependent. The majority of the p19ARF+/- tumors deleted the wildtype p19ARF allele, in agreement with the previous studies, suggesting that p19ARF is a classic 'two hit' tumor suppressor. In a p53+/- background, however, all p19ARF+/- tumors retained a wildtype ARF allele and most also retained wildtype p53. In the second cross between p19ARF-deficient and Mdm2 transgenic mice, cooperativity in tumor incidence between Mdm2 overexpression and ARF deficiency was observed, consistent with the role of p19ARF in negatively regulating Mdm2 activity. These experiments further demonstrate in vivo the inter-relationships of the p19ARF-Mdm2-p53 signaling axis in tumor suppression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deleting Arf in a p53-null background does not change the rate of tumor development.
“deletion of Arf in a p53-null background does not alter the rate of tumor development”
From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Moore, et al., 2003
Deleting Arf together with Mdm2 overexpression accelerates tumorigenesis.
“deletion of Arf concurrently with Mdm2 overexpression accelerates tumorigenesis”
From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Moore, et al., 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Moore, L., Venkatachalam, S., Vogel, H., Watt, J. C., Wu, C.-L., Steinman, H., Jones, S. N., & Donehower, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Donehower, Lawrence A
- ORCID
- Vogel, Hannes
- Venue
- Oncogene
- Published
- 2003-10-30
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 7831-7837
- ISSN
- 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5594
- OpenAlex
- W2140529820
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oncogene (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
- Keywords
- p19ARF, MDM2, p53, tumor suppression, carcinogenesis, MDM2 overexpression, p53-deficient mice, oncogenic stress
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Animals, Genotype, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neoplasms, Experimental, Nuclear Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Tumor Suppressor Protein p14ARF, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review