Cited by 256Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerSignaling Pathways in DiseaseHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

Differential effects of inactivated Axin1 and activated β-catenin mutations in human hepatocellular carcinomas

Open access
Zucman-Rossi, J, Benhamouche, S, Godard, C, Boyault, S, Grimber, G, Balabaud, C, Cunha, A S, Bioulac-Sage, P +1 more·2007·Oncogene

Abstract

Perturbations to the Wnt signaling pathway have been implicated in a large proportion of human hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Activating beta-catenin mutations and loss of function mutations in Axin1 are thought to be functionally equivalent. We examined the Wnt pathway in HCC by comparing the expression of beta-catenin target genes and the level of beta-catenin-dependent transcriptional activation, in 45 HCC tumors and four cell lines. Among these samples, beta-catenin and AXIN1 were mutated in 20 and seven cases, respectively. We found a significant correlation between activated beta-catenin mutations and overexpression of mRNA for the target genes glutamine synthetase (GS), G-protein-coupled receptor (GPR)49 and glutamate transporter (GLT)-1 (P=0.0001), but not for the genes ornithine aminotransferase, LECT2, c-myc and cyclin D1. We also showed that GS is a good immunohistochemical marker of beta-catenin activation in HCC. However, we observed no induction of GS, GPR49 or GLT-1 in the five inactivated Axin1 tumors. Beta-catenin-dependent transcriptional activation in two Axin1-mutated HCC cell lines was much weaker than in beta-catenin-mutated cell lines. Our results strongly suggest that in HCC, contrary to expectation, the loss of function of Axin1 is not equivalent to the gain of function of beta-catenin. Our results also suggest that the tumor suppressor function of Axin1 in HCC may be related to another, non-Wnt pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1209824

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zucman-Rossi, J., Benhamouche, S., Godard, C., Boyault, S., Grimber, G., Balabaud, C., Cunha, A. S., Bioulac-Sage, P., & Perret, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
Corresponding author
Perret, C
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2006-09-11
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
774-780
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W1969649798
Cited by
256
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, Wnt signaling, CTNNB1 mutation, glutamine synthetase, GLT-1, tumor suppressor function, immunohistochemical markers
MeSH terms
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Mutation, Repressor Proteins, Tumor Cells, Cultured, beta Catenin, Axin Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review