Cited by 166Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerGene Regulatory Network AnalysisProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

A hidden oncogenic positive feedback loop caused by crosstalk between Wnt and ERK pathways

Kim, D, Rath, O, Kolch, W, Cho, K-H·2007·Oncogene

Abstract

The Wnt and the extracellular signal regulated-kinase (ERK) pathways are both involved in the pathogenesis of various kinds of cancers. Recently, the existence of crosstalk between Wnt and ERK pathways was reported. Gathering all reported results, we have discovered a positive feedback loop embedded in the crosstalk between the Wnt and ERK pathways. We have developed a plausible model that represents the role of this hidden positive feedback loop in the Wnt/ERK pathway crosstalk based on the integration of experimental reports and employing established basic mathematical models of each pathway. Our analysis shows that the positive feedback loop can generate bistability in both the Wnt and ERK signaling pathways, and this prediction was further validated by experiments. In particular, using the commonly accepted assumption that mutations in signaling proteins contribute to cancerogenesis, we have found two conditions through which mutations could evoke an irreversible response leading to a sustained activation of both pathways. One condition is enhanced production of beta-catenin, the other is a reduction of the velocity of MAP kinase phosphatase(s). This enables that high activities of Wnt and ERK pathways are maintained even without a persistent extracellular signal. Thus, our study adds a novel aspect to the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis by showing that mutational changes in individual proteins can cause fundamental functional changes well beyond the pathway they function in by a positive feedback loop embedded in crosstalk. Thus, crosstalk between signaling pathways provides a vehicle through which mutations of individual components can affect properties of the system at a larger scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1210230

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, D., Rath, O., Kolch, W., & Cho, K.-H.
Affiliations
  • Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute (GB)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, K-H
ORCID
Rath, O
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2007-01-22
Volume
26
Issue
31
Pages
4571-4579
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2131448225
Cited by
166
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
Wnt signaling, ERK signaling, pathway crosstalk, positive feedback loop, bistability, MAP kinase phosphatase, β-catenin, carcinogenesis, mathematical modeling of signaling
MeSH terms
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Feedback, Humans, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Mutation, Colorectal Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Cell Line, Tumor, Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin, TCF Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review