A hidden oncogenic positive feedback loop caused by crosstalk between Wnt and ERK pathways
Abstract
The Wnt and the extracellular signal regulated-kinase (ERK) pathways are both involved in the pathogenesis of various kinds of cancers. Recently, the existence of crosstalk between Wnt and ERK pathways was reported. Gathering all reported results, we have discovered a positive feedback loop embedded in the crosstalk between the Wnt and ERK pathways. We have developed a plausible model that represents the role of this hidden positive feedback loop in the Wnt/ERK pathway crosstalk based on the integration of experimental reports and employing established basic mathematical models of each pathway. Our analysis shows that the positive feedback loop can generate bistability in both the Wnt and ERK signaling pathways, and this prediction was further validated by experiments. In particular, using the commonly accepted assumption that mutations in signaling proteins contribute to cancerogenesis, we have found two conditions through which mutations could evoke an irreversible response leading to a sustained activation of both pathways. One condition is enhanced production of beta-catenin, the other is a reduction of the velocity of MAP kinase phosphatase(s). This enables that high activities of Wnt and ERK pathways are maintained even without a persistent extracellular signal. Thus, our study adds a novel aspect to the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis by showing that mutational changes in individual proteins can cause fundamental functional changes well beyond the pathway they function in by a positive feedback loop embedded in crosstalk. Thus, crosstalk between signaling pathways provides a vehicle through which mutations of individual components can affect properties of the system at a larger scale.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Six out of 19 publications recorded their own wet-lab data [28, 31, 32, 45, 51, 57].
“When looking at Wet-lab Data, six out of 19 publications recorded their own wet-lab data [28, 31, 32, 45, 51, 57].”
From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The simulation models developed in [29, 32, 34-36, 39, 41] had neither been calibrated nor validated explicitly, because they used parameter values from other studies.
“The simulations models developed in [29, 32, 34–36, 39, 41] had neither been calibrated nor validated explicitly, because they used parameter values from other studies.”
From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
A fourth cluster forms around studies that include MAPK/ERK [32] or MAPK/ERK + PI3K/Akt [53].
“A forth cluster forms around studies that include MAPK/ERK [32] or MAPK/ERK + PI3K/Akt [53].”
From Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Godoy, P., Hewitt, N. J., Albrecht, U., Andersen, M. E., Ansari, N., Bhattacharya, S., Bode, J. G., Bolleyn, J., Borner, C., Böttger, J., et al. (2013) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1078-5 · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Kogan, Y., Halevi-Tobias, K. E., Hochman, G., Baczmanska, A. K., Leyns, L., & Agur, Z. (2012) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20111887 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Padala, R. R., Karnawat, R., Viswanathan, S. B., Thakkar, A. V., & Das, A. B. (2017) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c6mb00786d · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Elucidating the Sources of β-Catenin Dynamics in Human Neural Progenitor Cells
Mazemondet, O., John, M., Leye, S., Rolfs, A., & Uhrmacher, A. M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042792 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models
Budde, K., Smith, J., Wilsdorf, P., Haack, F., & Uhrmacher, A. M. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009227 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
A general hypothesis of multistable systems in pathophysiology.
Burlando, B. (2022) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.123183.3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, D., Rath, O., Kolch, W., & Cho, K.-H.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute (GB)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Cho, K-H
- ORCID
- Rath, O
- Venue
- Oncogene
- Published
- 2007-01-22
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 4571-4579
- ISSN
- 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5594
- OpenAlex
- W2131448225
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oncogene (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- Wnt signaling, ERK signaling, pathway crosstalk, positive feedback loop, bistability, MAP kinase phosphatase, β-catenin, carcinogenesis, mathematical modeling of signaling
- MeSH terms
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Feedback, Humans, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Mutation, Colorectal Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Cell Line, Tumor, Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin, TCF Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review