Cited by 86Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentDNA Repair Mechanisms

Elevated Mdm2 expression induces chromosomal instability and confers a survival and growth advantage to B cells

Wang, P, Lushnikova, T, Odvody, J, Greiner, T C, Jones, S N, Eischen, C M·2008·Oncogene

Abstract

Mdm2, a regulator of the p53 tumor suppressor, is frequently overexpressed in lymphomas, including lymphomas that have inactivated p53. However, the biological consequences of Mdm2 overexpression in lymphocytes are not fully resolved. Here, we report that increased expression of Mdm2 in B cells augmented proliferation and reduced susceptibility to p53-dependent apoptosis, which was due to inhibition of p53 and suppression of p21 expression. Notably, developing and mature B cells from Mdm2 transgenic mice had an increased frequency of chromosomal/chromatid breaks and/or aneuploidy. This Mdm2-mediated genome instability occurred at a similar frequency as that in B cells overexpressing the oncogene c-Myc, but the chromosomal instability was not further enhanced when Mdm2 and c-Myc were overexpressed together. Elevated Mdm2 expression alone increased the occurrence of B-cell transformation in vivo and cooperated with c-Myc overexpression, resulting in an acceleration of B-cell lymphomagenesis. In addition, the frequency of p53 mutations was reduced, but not eliminated, in lymphomas arising in Mdm2/Emu-myc double transgenic mice. Therefore, increased Mdm2 expression facilitated B-cell lymphomagenesis, in part, through regulation of p53 by altering B-cell proliferation and susceptibility to apoptosis, and by inducing chromosomal instability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1210788

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies have shown that Mdm2 overexpression can promote certain forms of genome instability, such as aneuploidy and centrosome duplication.

    “Studies have shown that Mdm2 overexpression can promote certain forms of genome instability, such as aneuploidy and centrosome duplication (9, 50).”
  • Deleting Arf or overexpressing Mdm2 accelerated Myc-driven B cell lymphoma at a rate similar to that caused by Myc overexpression plus p53 deficiency.

    “Specifically, deletion of Arf or overexpression of Mdm2 accelerated Myc (MIM#190080) oncogene-induced B cell lymphoma development at a rate similar to that caused by Myc overexpression and p53 deficiency.”

    From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Wang, et al., 2008

  • Loss of Arf or overexpression of Mdm2 significantly reduced the selection for p53 mutations that normally occurs during Myc-induced B cell lymphomagenesis.

    “Moreover, loss of Arf or overexpression of Mdm2 significantly reduced the selection for p53 mutations that normally arise during Myc-induced B cell lymphomagenesis (Eischen, et al., 1999; Wang, et al., 2008).”

    From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Wang, et al., 2008

  • Lymphoma caused by c-Myc appears sooner in transgenic mice that overexpress Mdm2.

    “Previous studies have shown that c-Myc-induced lymphoma was accelerated in transgenic mice overexpressing Mdm2 [76], but was delayed in Mdm2 or Mdmx heterozygous mice [77].”

    From The p53 orchestra: Mdm2 and Mdmx set the tone (2010) · cites this paper as [76]

  • In primary B cells from young mice, Mdm2 overexpression leads to an increase in DNA breaks and aneuploidy.

    “We previously showed that in primary B cells in young mice, Mdm2 overexpression leads to an increase in DNA breaks and aneuploidy (Wang et al., 2008).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 86

Authors
Wang, P., Lushnikova, T., Odvody, J., Greiner, T. C., Jones, S. N., & Eischen, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Eischen, C M
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2007-09-10
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
1590-1598
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2066910712
Cited by
86
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lymphoma Research Foundation
  • Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA117935, CA098139, CA117935, R01CA098139)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
MDM2, p53, B cells, chromosomal instability, B-cell lymphomagenesis, p21, apoptosis resistance, B cell proliferation, aneuploidy, c-Myc, TP53 mutation, genomic instability
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Survival, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Blotting, Southern, Blotting, Western, Survival Rate, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Lymphoma, B-Cell, Apoptosis, Chromosomal Instability, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, Precursor Cells, B-Lymphoid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review