The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Languages cool as they expand: Allometric scaling and the decreasing need for new words
Open accessAbstract
We analyze the occurrence frequencies of over 15 million words recorded in millions of books published during the past two centuries in seven different languages. For all languages and chronological subsets of the data we confirm that two scaling regimes characterize the word frequency distributions, with only the more common words obeying the classic Zipf law. Using corpora of unprecedented size, we test the allometric scaling relation between the corpus size and the vocabulary size of growing languages to demonstrate a decreasing marginal need for new words, a feature that is likely related to the underlying correlations between words. We calculate the annual growth fluctuations of word use which has a decreasing trend as the corpus size increases, indicating a slowdown in linguistic evolution following language expansion. This "cooling pattern" forms the basis of a third statistical regularity, which unlike the Zipf and the Heaps law, is dynamical in nature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/070710111 · Cited by 8,019
Kleiber, M. (1932) · Hilgardia · doi:10.3733/hilg.v06n11p315 · Cited by 2,222
Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language
Cancho, R. F. I., & Solé, R. V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0335980100 · Cited by 588
Barabási, A.-L. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2188 · Cited by 502
Cited by
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116 · Cited by 478
Pechenick, E. A., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137041 · Cited by 436
Quantifying Wikipedia Usage Patterns Before Stock Market Moves
Moat, H. S., Curme, C., Avakian, A., Kenett, D. Y., Stanley, H. E., & Preis, T. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01801 · Cited by 317
Self-citationThe advantage of short paper titles
Letchford, A., Moat, H. S., & Preis, T. (2015) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.150266 · Cited by 184
The difficulties of systematic reviews
Westgate, M. J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2017) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12890 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Petersen, A. M., Tenenbaum, J. N., Havlin, S., Stanley, H. E., & Perc, M.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2012-12-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 943-943
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010254479
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 272.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
