The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Localized attacks on spatially embedded networks with dependencies
Open accessAbstract
Many real world complex systems such as critical infrastructure networks are embedded in space and their components may depend on one another to function. They are also susceptible to geographically localized damage caused by malicious attacks or natural disasters. Here, we study a general model of spatially embedded networks with dependencies under localized attacks. We develop a theoretical and numerical approach to describe and predict the effects of localized attacks on spatially embedded systems with dependencies. Surprisingly, we find that a localized attack can cause substantially more damage than an equivalent random attack. Furthermore, we find that for a broad range of parameters, systems which appear stable are in fact metastable. Though robust to random failures—even of finite fraction—if subjected to a localized attack larger than a critical size which is independent of the system size (i.e., a zero fraction), a cascading failure emerges which leads to complete system collapse. Our results demonstrate the potential high risk of localized attacks on spatially embedded network systems with dependencies and may be useful for designing more resilient systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Newman, M. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001 · Cited by 6,595
Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies
(2001) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/37.969131 · Cited by 2,851
Cascade-based attacks on complex networks
Motter, A. E., & Lai, Y.-C. (2002) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.065102 · Cited by 1,929
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Helbing, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12047 · Cited by 1,281
Avalanche Collapse of Interdependent Networks
Baxter, G. J., Dorogovtsev, S. N., Goltsev, A. V., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.248701 · Cited by 376
Percolation of localized attack on complex networks
Shao, S., Huang, X., Stanley, H. E., & Havlin, S. (2015) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/2/023049 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Cited by
Kivela, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Complex Networks · doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu016 · Cited by 3,235
Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures
Zio, E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009 · Cited by 429
Percolation on complex networks: Theory and application
Li, M., Liu, R.-R., Lü, L., Hu, M.-B., Xu, S., & Zhang, Y.-C. (2021) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.12.003 · Cited by 365
Small vulnerable sets determine large network cascades in power grids
Yang, Y., Nishikawa, T., & Motter, A. E. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan3184 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Berezin, Y., Bashan, A., Danziger, M. M., Li, D., & Havlin, S.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2015-03-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8934-8934
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3103832685
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Localized attacks on spatially embedded networks with dependencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep08934
- The paper
- Berezin, Y., Bashan, A., Danziger, M. M., Li, D., & Havlin, S. (2015). Localized attacks on spatially embedded networks with dependencies. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08934
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.