The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effects of interfacial potential on antimicrobial propensity of ZnO nanoparticle
Open accessAbstract
The work investigates the role of interfacial potential in defining antimicrobial propensity of ZnO nanoparticle (ZnONP) against different Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. ZnONPs with positive and negative surface potential are tested against different bacteria with varying surface potentials, ranging −14.7 to −23.6 mV. Chemically synthesized ZnONPs with positive surface potential show very high antimicrobial propensity with minimum inhibitory concentration of 50 and 100 μg/mL for Gram negative and positive bacterium, respectively. On other hand, ZnONPs of the same size but with negative surface potential show insignificant antimicrobial propensity against the studied bacteria. Unlike the positively charged nanoparticles, neither Zn 2+ ion nor negatively charged ZnONP shows any significant inhibition in growth or morphology of the bacterium. Potential neutralization and colony forming unit studies together proved adverse effect of the resultant nano-bacterial interfacial potential on bacterial viability. Thus, ZnONP with positive surface potential upon interaction with negative surface potential of bacterial membrane enhances production of the reactive oxygen species and exerts mechanical stress on the membrane, resulting in the membrane depolarization. Our results show that the antimicrobial propensity of metal oxide nanoparticle mainly depends upon the interfacial potential, the potential resulting upon interaction of nanoparticle surface with bacterial membrane.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antimicrobial activity of iron oxide nanoparticle upon modulation of nanoparticle-bacteria interface
Arakha, M., Pal, S., Samantarrai, D., Panigrahi, T. K., Mallick, B. C., Pramanik, K., Mallick, B., & Jha, S. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14813 · Cited by 804
Self-citationPreparation and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Leaf Extract of Sambucus ebulus
Alamdari, S., Sasani Ghamsari, M., Lee, C., Han, W., Park, H.-H., Tafreshi, M. J., Afarideh, H., & Ara, M. H. M. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10103620 · Cited by 452
Increased antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles: Influence of size and surface modification
Lallo da Silva, B., Caetano, B. L., Chiari-Andréo, B. G., Pietro, R. C. L. R., & Chiavacci, L. A. (2019) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.02.013 · Cited by 423
A Review on Enhancing the Antibacterial Activity of ZnO: Mechanisms and Microscopic Investigation
Abebe, B., Zereffa, E. A., Tadesse, A., & Murthy, H. C. A. (2020) · Nanoscale Research Letters · doi:10.1186/s11671-020-03418-6 · Cited by 423
Buchman, J. T., Hudson-Smith, N. V., Landy, K. M., & Haynes, C. L. (2019) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00053 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Arakha, M., Saleem, M., Mallick, B. C., & Jha, S.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2015-04-15
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9578-9578
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077718313
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of interfacial potential on antimicrobial propensity of ZnO nanoparticle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep09578
- The paper
- Arakha, M., Saleem, M., Mallick, B. C., & Jha, S. (2015). The effects of interfacial potential on antimicrobial propensity of ZnO nanoparticle. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.