The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repeated, long-distance migrations by a philopatric predator targeting highly contrasting ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Long-distance movements of animals are an important driver of population spatial dynamics and determine the extent of overlap with area-focused human activities, such as fishing. Despite global concerns of declining shark populations, a major limitation in assessments of population trends or spatial management options is the lack of information on their long-term migratory behaviour. For a large marine predator, the tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier, we show from individuals satellite-tracked for multiple years (up to 1101 days) that adult males undertake annually repeated, round-trip migrations of over 7,500 km in the northwest Atlantic. Notably, these migrations occurred between the highly disparate ecosystems of Caribbean coral reef regions in winter and high latitude oceanic areas in summer, with strong, repeated philopatry to specific overwintering insular habitat. Partial migration also occurred, with smaller, immature individuals displaying reduced migration propensity. Foraging may be a putative motivation for these oceanic migrations, with summer behaviour showing higher path tortuosity at the oceanic range extremes. The predictable migratory patterns and use of highly divergent ecosystems shown by male tiger sharks appear broadly similar to migrations seen in birds, reptiles and mammals and highlight opportunities for dynamic spatial management and conservation measures of highly mobile sharks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic
Baum, J. K., Myers, R. A., Kehler, D. G., Worm, B., Harley, S. J., & Doherty, P. A. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079777 · Cited by 1,197
Cited by
Global spatial risk assessment of sharks under the footprint of fisheries
Queiroz, N., Humphries, N. E., Couto, A., Vedor, M., da Costa, I., Sequeira, A. M. M., Mucientes, G., Santos, A. M., Abascal, F. J., Abercrombie, D. L., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1444-4 · Cited by 398
Self-citationEnzyme entrapment, biocatalyst immobilization without covalent attachment
Imam, H. T., Marr, P. C., & Marr, A. C. (2021) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d1gc01852c · Cited by 328
López de Andrés, J., Griñán-Lisón, C., Jiménez, G., & Marchal, J. A. (2020) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-020-00966-3 · Cited by 207
Ashaolu, T. J., Samborska, K., Lee, C. C., Tomas, M., Capanoglu, E., Tarhan, Ö., Taze, B., & Jafari, S. M. (2021) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.064 · Cited by 184
Factors influencing the gut microbiome in children: from infancy to childhood
Kumbhare, S. V., Patangia, D. V., Patil, R. H., Shouche, Y. S., & Patil, N. P. (2019) · Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12038-019-9860-z · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Lea, J. S. E., Wetherbee, B. M., Queiroz, N., Burnie, N., Aming, C., Sousa, L. L., Mucientes, G. R., Humphries, N. E., Harvey, G. M., Sims, D. W., & Shivji, M. S.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2015-06-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11202-11202
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1946143552
- Cited by
- 808
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 70.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.