Cited by 64Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchEpigenetics and DNA MethylationPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Clinicopathological Significance of CDKN2A Promoter Hypermethylation Frequency with Pancreatic Cancer

Open access
Tang, Bo, Li, Yang, Qi, Guangying, Yuan, Shengguang, Wang, Zhenran, Yu, Shuiping, Li, Bo, He, Songqing·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients is very poor, with a 5-year survival of less than 6%. Previous studies demonstrated that the loss of function of CDKN2A is mainly caused by the hypermethylation of CDKN2A gene promoter; however, whether or not it is associated with the incidence of pancreatic cancer still remains unclear. In this study, we systematically reviewed the association between CDKN2A promoter methylation and pancreatic cancer using meta-analysis methods. The pooled data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.2. Fourteen studies eligible studies, including 418 pancreatic cancer, 155 pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanINs) and 45 chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients were analyzed. We observed that the frequency of CDKN2A methylation was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer patients than in normal healthy controls, the pooled OR = 17.19, 95% CI = 8.72–33.86, P < 0.00001. The frequency of CDKN2A methylation was also significantly higher in PanINs patients than that in normal individual controls, OR = 12.35, 95% CI = 1.70–89.89, P = 0.01. In addition, CDKN2A methylation was associated with worse survival in pancreatic cancer, HR = 4.46, 95% CI = 1.37–14.53, P = 0.01. The results strongly suggest that CDKN2A methylation is correlated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. CDKN2A methylation plays a critical role in pancreatic carcinogenesis and may serve as a prognostic marker.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep13563

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CDKN2A methylation is associated with different types of pancreatic cancers, including PDAC and PNET, and correlates with shorter overall survival in both PNET and PDAC.

    “The methylation is associated with different types of pancreatic cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET), correlating with shorter overall survival in both PNET and PDAC [50].”

    From Significance of TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and KRAS in Pancreatic Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Results (CDKN2A methylation and clinicopathological features; page unavailable) report elevated methylation frequency in both pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) and pancreatic endocrine neoplasms (PENs). The prognostic Results associate methylation with shorter overall survival in PENs and in pancreatic cancer overall, but do not establish that survival association separately for PDA. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CDKN2A mutations and methylation play a crucial role in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis.

    “CDKN2A mutations and methylation play a crucial role in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis.”
  • Higher CDKN2A methylation is observed in pancreatic cancer patients, making it a potential diagnostic tool, particularly in blood, pancreatic tissue and juice samples.

    “Higher CDKN2A methylation is observed in pancreatic cancer patients, making it a potential diagnostic tool, particularly when analyzed in blood, pancreatic tissue and juice samples.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, B., Li, Y., Qi, G., Yuan, S., Wang, Z., Yu, S., Li, B., & He, S.
Affiliations
Guilin Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Tang, Bo
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-09-04
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
13563-13563
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1222822579
Cited by
64
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (30870719, 81160066, No. 81360367, 81360367)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
CDKN2A, promoter hypermethylation, pancreatic cancer, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, chronic pancreatitis, cancer risk, prognostic factors, pancreatic carcinogenesis, DNA methylation
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetic Markers, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Incidence, Survival Rate, DNA Methylation, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review