Cited by 172Traditional Chinese Medicine StudiesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic Research

Genome-wide analysis correlates Ayurveda Prakriti

Open access
Govindaraj, Periyasamy, Nizamuddin, Sheikh, Sharath, Anugula, Jyothi, Vuskamalla, Rotti, Harish, Raval, Ritu, Nayak, Jayakrishna, Bhat, Balakrishna K. +14 more·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The practice of Ayurveda , the traditional medicine of India, is based on the concept of three major constitutional types (Vata, Pitta and Kapha) defined as “ Prakriti ”. To the best of our knowledge, no study has convincingly correlated genomic variations with the classification of Prakriti. In the present study, we performed genome-wide SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) analysis (Affymetrix, 6.0) of 262 well-classified male individuals (after screening 3416 subjects) belonging to three Prakritis. We found 52 SNPs ( p ≤ 1 × 10 −5 ) were significantly different between Prakritis , without any confounding effect of stratification, after 10 6 permutations. Principal component analysis (PCA) of these SNPs classified 262 individuals into their respective groups (Vata, Pitta and Kapha) irrespective of their ancestry, which represent its power in categorization. We further validated our finding with 297 Indian population samples with known ancestry. Subsequently, we found that PGM1 correlates with phenotype of Pitta as described in the ancient text of Caraka Samhita, suggesting that the phenotypic classification of India’s traditional medicine has a genetic basis; and its Prakriti -based practice in vogue for many centuries resonates with personalized medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep15786

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment with Tinospora cordifolia was found to reduce mortality comparable to that of a combination of metronidazole and gentamicin.

    “Treatment with Tinospora cordifolia was found to reduce the mortality comparable to that of a combination of metronidazole and gentamicin.$^{1}$^{6}”

    From Contemporary Conversations between Ayurveda and Biomedicine (2014) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results and Discussions passage concerns genetic associations among Prakriti groups, while the Methods passages describe genotyping and sequencing; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. Searches for Tinospora cordifolia, mortality, metronidazole, and gentamicin found no passage addressing the treatment comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Hankey A. Ayurvedic physiology and etiology: Ayurvedo Amritanaam. The doshas and their functioning in terms of contemporary biology and physical chemistry. J. Altern.Complement Med. 7, 567– 574 (2001). 11719949
  2. Hankey A. A test of the systems analysis underlying the scientific theory of Ayurveda's Tridosha. J. Altern.Complement Med. 11, 385– 390 (2005). 15992219
  3. Bhushan P., Kalpana J. & Arvind C. Classification of human population based on HLA gene polymorphism and the concept of Prakriti in Ayurveda. J. Altern. Complement Med. 11, 349– 353 (2005). 15865503
  4. Ghodke Y., Joshi K. & Patwardhan B. Traditional Medicine to Modern Pharmacogenomics: Ayurveda Prakriti Type and CYP2C19 Gene Polymorphism Associated with the Metabolic Variability. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2011, 249528 (2011). 20015960 PMC3135904
  5. Aggarwal S.. EGLN1 involvement in high-altitude adaptation revealed through genetic analysis of extreme constitution types defined in Ayurveda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 18961– 18966 (2010). 20956315 PMC2973881
  6. Juyal R. C.. Potential of ayurgenomics approach in complex trait research: leads from a pilot study on rheumatoid arthritis. PloS one. 7, e45752 (2012). 23049851 PMC3458907
  7. Rotti H.. Immunophenotyping of normal individuals classified on the basis of human dosha prakriti. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 5, 43– 49 (2014). 24812475 PMC4012362
  8. Rotti H.. Determinants of prakriti, the human constitution types of Indian traditional medicine and its correlation with contemporary science. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 5, 167– 175 (2014). 25336848 PMC4204287
  9. Rotti H.. DNA methylation analysis of phenotype specific stratified Indian population. J. Transl. Med. 13, 151 (2015). 25952924 PMC4438459
  10. Mahalle N. P., Kulkarni M. V., Pendse N. M. & Naik S. S. Association of constitutional type of Ayurveda with cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory markers and insulin resistance. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 3, 150– 157 (2012). 23125512 PMC3487241
  11. Prasher B.. Whole genome expression and biochemical correlates of extreme constitutional types defined in Ayurveda. J. Transl. Med. 6, 48 (2008). 18782426 PMC2562368
  12. Bhalerao S., Deshpande T. & Thatte U. Prakriti (Ayurvedic concept of constitution) and variations in platelet aggregation. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 12, 248 (2012). 23228069 PMC3562518
  13. Korn J. M.. Integrated genotype calling and association analysis of SNPs, common copy number polymorphisms and rare CNVs. Nat. Genet. 40, 1253– 1260 (2008). 18776909 PMC2756534
  14. Patterson N., Price A. L. & Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2, e190 (2006). 17194218 PMC1713260
  15. Freedman M. L.. Assessing the impact of population stratification on genetic association studies. Nat. Genet. 36, 388– 393 (2004). 15052270
  16. Helgason A., Yngvadottir B., Hrafnkelsson B., Gulcher J. & Stefansson K. An Icelandic example of the impact of population structure on association studies. Nat. Genet. 37, 90– 95 (2005). 15608637
  17. Purcell S.. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559– 575 (2007). 17701901 PMC1950838
  18. Yang J., Lee S. H., Goddard M. E. & Visscher P. M. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76– 82 (2011). 21167468 PMC3014363
  19. Huang R. S.. Identification of genetic variants contributing to cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity by use of a genomewide approach. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 427– 437 (2007). 17701890 PMC1950832
  20. Jorgenson E. & Witte J. S. A gene-centric approach to genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 885– 891 (2006). 17047687
  21. Thangaraj K.. CAG repeat expansion in the androgen receptor gene is not associated with male infertility in Indian populations. J. Androl. 23, 815– 818 (2002). 12399527

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Govindaraj, P., Nizamuddin, S., Sharath, A., Jyothi, V., Rotti, H., Raval, R., Nayak, J., Bhat, B. K., Prasanna, B. V., Shintre, P., Sule, M., Joshi, K. S., Dedge, A. P., Bharadwaj, R., Gangadharan, G. G., Nair, S., Gopinath, P. M., Patwardhan, B., Kondaiah, P., Satyamoorthy, K., Valiathan, M. V. S., & Thangaraj, K.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (IN)
  • Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
  • Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Ayurveda & Hospital Udupi (IN)
  • Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions (IN)
  • Savitribai Phule Pune University (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-10-29
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
15786-15786
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2176913036
Cited by
172
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) (acceptedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
Ayurveda, Prakriti, Vata dosha, Pitta, Kapha, single nucleotide polymorphisms, PGM1, Charaka Samhita, personalized medicine, genetic ancestry
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Medicine, Ayurvedic, Phosphoglucomutase, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review