Cited by 82Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentAction Observation and SynchronizationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other’s pain: an ERP study

Open access
Cui, Fang, Ma, Ning, Luo, Yue-jia·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Morality and empathy are both crucial in building human society. Yet the relationship between them has been merely explored. The present study revealed how the morality influenced empathy for pain by comparing the ERPs elicited by pictures showing the targets’ in pain primed by different moral information about the targets. We found that when the target was a moral one or a neutral one, the painful pictures elicited significantly larger amplitude in N2 than the non-painful pictures, but when the target was an immoral one, the difference between the amplitudes of N2 component elicited by painful and non-painful pictures became insignificant. We proposed that this effect was induced by the decreased affective arousal when observing an immoral person in pain. The reduced neural response towards the immoral one’s pain can keep us alert when we face the potentially dangerous people thereby increasing our chance of survival. SLORTEA results showed the source of this difference in N2 localized in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep20851

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difference in brain responses to painful and non-painful stimuli is decreased compared to when the person in pain is moral or neutral to the observer.

    “The difference in brain responses to painful and non-painful stimuli being decreased compared to when the person in pain is moral or neutral to the observer.156”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 82

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mehrabian A. Relations among personality scales of aggression, violence, and empathy: validational evidence bearing on the Risk of Eruptive Violence Scale. Aggress. Behav. 23, 445 (1997).

Authors
Cui, F., Ma, N., & Luo, Y.-J.
Affiliations
Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Cui, Fang
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-02-11
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
20851-20851
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2417306687
Cited by
82
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (91132704, 31500877)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
moral judgment, empathy for pain, pain perception, N2 component, event-related potentials, emotional arousal, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex
MeSH terms
Electroencephalography, Empathy, Evoked Potentials, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Judgment, Male, Morals, Pain, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review