The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks
Open accessAbstract
Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks plays a crucial role in effective information spreading. A simple strategy is to choose top-r ranked nodes as spreaders according to influence ranking method such as PageRank, ClusterRank and k-shell decomposition. Besides, some heuristic methods such as hill-climbing, SPIN, degree discount and independent set based are also proposed. However, these approaches suffer from a possibility that some spreaders are so close together that they overlap sphere of influence or time consuming. In this report, we present a simply yet effectively iterative method named VoteRank to identify a set of decentralized spreaders with the best spreading ability. In this approach, all nodes vote in a spreader in each turn, and the voting ability of neighbors of elected spreader will be decreased in subsequent turn. Experimental results on four real networks show that under Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) and Susceptible-Infected (SI) models, VoteRank outperforms the traditional benchmark methods on both spreading rate and final affected scale. What’s more, VoteRank has superior computational efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062 · cited 1×
“Very recently, Morone and Makse presented an effective method to find a set of critical nodes by mapping the problem onto optimal percolation in random networks 36 .”
MethodThe anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment
Kleinberg, J. M. (1999) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/324133.324140 · Cited by 8,959
Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., & Tardos, É. (2003) · Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/956750.956769 · Cited by 7,326
The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases
Hethcote, H. W. (2000) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144500371907 · Cited by 6,687
Epidemic Spreading in Scale-Free Networks
Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.3200 · Cited by 5,731
The structure of scientific collaboration networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · Cited by 4,482
Diameter of the World-Wide Web
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/43601 · Cited by 4,260
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J.-X., Chen, D.-B., Dong, Q., & Zhao, Z.-D.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-06-14
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27823-27823
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2962890993
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 10.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep27823
- The paper
- Zhang, J.-X., Chen, D.-B., Dong, Q., & Zhao, Z.-D. (2016). Identifying a set of influential spreaders in complex networks. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27823
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.