The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strength and Water Interactions of Cellulose I Filaments Wet-Spun from Cellulose Nanofibril Hydrogels
Open accessAbstract
Hydrogels comprising cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) were used in the synthesis of continuous filaments via wet-spinning. Hydrogel viscosity and spinnability, as well as orientation and strength of the spun filaments, were found to be strongly affected by the osmotic pressure as determined by CNF surface charge and solid fraction in the spinning dope. The tensile strength, Young’s modulus and degree of orientation (wide-angle X-ray scattering, WAXS) of filaments produced without drawing were 297 MPa, 21 GPa and 83%, respectively, which are remarkable values. A thorough investigation of the interactions with water using dynamic vapour sorption (DVS) experiments revealed the role of sorption sites in the stability of the filaments in wet conditions. DVS analysis during cycles of relative humidity (RH) between 0 and 95% revealed major differences in water uptake by the filaments spun from hydrogels of different charge density (CNF and TEMPO-oxidised CNF). It is concluded that the mechanical performance of filaments in the presence of water deteriorates drastically by the same factors that facilitate fibril alignment and, consequently, enhance dry strength. For the most oriented filaments, the maximum water vapour sorption at 95% RH was 39% based on dry weight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Cited by
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Nanofibrils in nature and materials engineering
Ling, S., Kaplan, D. L., & Buehler, M. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.16 · Cited by 730
Tree‐Inspired Design for High‐Efficiency Water Extraction
Zhu, M., Li, Y., Chen, G., Jiang, F., Yang, Z., Luo, X., Wang, Y., Lacey, S. D., Dai, J., Wang, C., et al. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201704107 · Cited by 694
Wood-based nanotechnologies toward sustainability
Jiang, F., Li, T., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Gong, A., Dai, J., Hitz, E., Luo, W., & Hu, L. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201703453 · Cited by 599
Nanocellulose in Thin Films, Coatings, and Plies for Packaging Applications: A Review
Hubbe, M. A., Ferrer, A., Tyagi, P., Yin, Y., Salas, C., Pal, L., & Rojas, O. J. (2017) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.12.1.2143-2233 · Cited by 508
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lundahl, M. J., Cunha, A. G., Rojo, E., Papageorgiou, A. C., Rautkari, L., Arboleda, J. C., & Rojas, O. J.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-07-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30695-30695
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2495931681
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strength and Water Interactions of Cellulose I Filaments Wet-Spun from Cellulose Nanofibril Hydrogels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep30695
- The paper
- Lundahl, M. J., Cunha, A. G., Rojo, E., Papageorgiou, A. C., Rautkari, L., Arboleda, J. C., & Rojas, O. J. (2016). Strength and Water Interactions of Cellulose I Filaments Wet-Spun from Cellulose Nanofibril Hydrogels. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.