Retrieval-based model accounts for striking profile of episodic memory and generalization
Open accessAbstract
A fundamental theoretical tension exists between the role of the hippocampus in generalizing across a set of related episodes, and in supporting memory for individual episodes. Whilst the former requires an appreciation of the commonalities across episodes, the latter emphasizes the representation of the specifics of individual experiences. We developed a novel version of the hippocampal-dependent paired associate inference (PAI) paradigm, which afforded us the unique opportunity to investigate the relationship between episodic memory and generalization in parallel. Across four experiments, we provide surprising evidence that the overlap between object pairs in the PAI paradigm results in a marked loss of episodic memory. Critically, however, we demonstrate that superior generalization ability was associated with stronger episodic memory. Through computational simulations we show that this striking profile of behavioral findings is best accounted for by a mechanism by which generalization occurs at the point of retrieval, through the recombination of related episodes on the fly. Taken together, our study offers new insights into the intricate relationship between episodic memory and generalization, and constrains theories of the mechanisms by which the hippocampus supports generalization.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adults' generalization relied on remembering specific item-context representations.
“Adults’ generalization relied on remembering specific item-context representations, consistent with the notion that rapid generalization relies on retrieving specific instances 7,8, and that there was no generalization-specificity trade off 28,29”
From Contingency of semantic generalization on episodic specificity varies across development (2021) · cites this paper as [7]
Preservation of rich contextual memories played a role in generalization for young adults.
“Preservation of rich contextual memories played a role in generalization for young adults, consistent with previous studies 6,7.”
From Contingency of semantic generalization on episodic specificity varies across development (2021) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 57
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Cohen N. J. & Eichenbaum H. Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System. (MIT Press, 1993).
- Burgess N. In The Hippocampus Book (eds. Bliss T., Andersen P., Amaral D. G., Morris R. G. & O’Keefe J.) 715– 751 (Oxford University Press, 2006).
- Kruschke J. K. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis, Second Edition: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. (Academic Press/Elsevier, 2015).
- Authors
- Banino, A., Koster, R., Hassabis, D., & Kumaran, D.
- Affiliations
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kumaran, Dharshan
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-08-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31330-31330
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4980665
- OpenAlex
- W2508916483
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic memory, generalization, hippocampus, memory retrieval, computational modeling
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Computer Simulation, Female, Generalization, Psychological, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Logistic Models, Memory, Episodic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review