Cited by 35Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Geostatistics and MappingSoil erosion and sediment transport

Spatially governed climate factors dominate management in determining the quantity and distribution of soil organic carbon in dryland agricultural systems

Open access
Hoyle, Frances C., O’Leary, Rebecca A., Murphy, Daniel V.·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Few studies describe the primary drivers influencing soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and the distribution of carbon (C) fractions in agricultural systems from semi-arid regions; yet these soils comprise one fifth of the global land area. Here we identified the primary drivers for changes in total SOC and associated particulate (POC), humus (HOC) and resistant (ROC) organic C fractions for 1347 sample points in the semi-arid agricultural region of Western Australia. Total SOC stock (0–0.3 m) varied from 4 to 209 t C ha−1 with 79% of variation explained by measured variables. The proportion of C in POC, HOC and ROC fractions averaged 28%, 45% and 27% respectively. Climate (43%) and land management practices (32%) had the largest relative influence on variation in total SOC. Carbon accumulation was constrained where average daily temperature was above 17.2 °C and annual rainfall below 450 mm, representing approximately 42% of the 197,300 km 2 agricultural region. As such large proportions of this region are not suited to C sequestration strategies. For the remainder of the region a strong influence of management practices on SOC indicate opportunities for C sequestration strategies associated with incorporation of longer pasture phases and adequate fertilisation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep31468

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interpretation of space-for-time substitution studies comparing crop production at locations with different SOC is problematic because soil texture and climate are strong confounding factors.

    “Interpretation is problematic, however, as soil texture and climate are strong confounding factors.”

    From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as Hoyle et al., 2016

    The Results (Total soil organic carbon and Soil organic carbon fractions; page unavailable) identify climate and soil texture as influences on SOC that could complicate comparisons between locations. The paper does not specifically evaluate space-for-time studies comparing crop production across locations or state that their interpretation is problematic. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Harrison P. & Pearce F. Population and Ecosystems: Deserts and drylands in AAAS Atlas of population and environment. (University of California Press Berkeley, 2000).
  2. Lal R. Intensive Agriculture and the Soil Carbon Pool. J. Crop Improv. 27(6), 735– 751 (2013).
  3. Chu C. et al. Does climate change directly influence NPP globally? Glob. Change Biol. 22, 12– 24 (2016). 26442433
  4. Viscarra Rossel R. A., Webster R., Bui E. N. & Baldock J. A. Baseline map of organic carbon in Australian soil to support national carbon accounting and monitoring under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2953– 2970 (2014). PMC4258068 24599716
  5. Holmes K. W., Wherrett A., Keating A. & Murphy D. V. Meeting bulk density sampling requirements efficiently to estimate soil carbon stocks. Aust. J. Soil Res. 49(8), 680– 695 (2012).
  6. Rabbi et al. Climate and soil properties limit the positive effects of land use reversion on carbon storage in Eastern Australia. Sci. Rep. 5, 17866. doi: 10.1038/srep17866 (2015). 26639009 PMC4671085 · DOI
  7. Lam S. K., Chen D., Mosier A. R. & Roush R. The potential for carbon sequestration in Australian agricultural soils is technically and economically limited. Sci. Rep. 3, 1– 6 (2015). PMC3713190 23846398
  8. Isbell R. F. ‘The Australian Soil Classification. Australian Soil and Land Survey Handbook. Vol. 4.’ (CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 1996).
  9. Ellert B. H., Janzen H. H. & McConkey B. G. Measuring and comparing soil carbon storage in Soil processes and the carbon cycle (ed. Lal R. et al.), 131– 146 (CRC Press, 2001).
  10. McKenzie N. & Cresswell H. Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land evaluation in Australian soil and land survey handbook series, Vol. 5 (eds McKenzie N., Coughlan K. & Cresswell H. (CSIRO Publishing; 2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoyle, F. C., O’Leary, R. A., & Murphy, D. V.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Hoyle, Frances C.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-08-17
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
31468-31468
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2511476771
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
  • Grains Research and Development Corporation
  • Australian Research Council (FT110100246)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon, rainfed agriculture, semi-arid agriculture, particulate organic carbon, climate drivers, land management practices, carbon sequestration, soil carbon fractions, Western Australia, rainfall, temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review