The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Erratum: Genetic variability in a frozen batch of MCF-7 cells invisible in routine authentication affecting cell function
Abstract
Scientific Reports 6: Article number: 28994; published online: 26 July 2016; updated: 14 September 2016
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An authenticated cell line can evolve in cell culture so that the same cell line obtained from different laboratories can display different properties, including genetic heterogeneity (Ben-David et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019; Kleensang et al., 2016).”
From Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0) (2021) · cites this paper as Kleensang et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0)
Pamies, D. (2021) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.2111011 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleensang, A., Vantangoli, M. M., Odwin-DaCosta, S., Andersen, M. E., Boekelheide, K., Bouhifd, M., Fornace, A. J., Li, H.-H., Livi, C. B., Madnick, S., Maertens, A., Rosenberg, M., Yager, J. D., Zhao, L., & Hartung, T.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-09-14
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2045-2322
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erratum: Genetic variability in a frozen batch of MCF-7 cells invisible in routine authentication affecting cell function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/srep33011
- The paper
- Kleensang, A., Vantangoli, M. M., Odwin-DaCosta, S., Andersen, M. E., Boekelheide, K., Bouhifd, M., Fornace, A. J., Li, H.-H., Livi, C. B., Madnick, S., Maertens, A., Rosenberg, M., Yager, J. D., Zhao, L., & Hartung, T. (2016). Erratum: Genetic variability in a frozen batch of MCF-7 cells invisible in routine authentication affecting cell function. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33011
