A combination of physical activity and computerized brain training improves verbal memory and increases cerebral glucose metabolism in the elderly
Open accessAbstract
Physical exercise interventions and cognitive training programs have individually been reported to improve cognition in the healthy elderly population; however, the clinical significance of using a combined approach is currently lacking. This study evaluated whether physical activity (PA), computerized cognitive training and/or a combination of both could improve cognition. In this nonrandomized study, 224 healthy community-dwelling older adults (60-85 years) were assigned to 16 weeks home-based PA (n=64), computerized cognitive stimulation (n=62), a combination of both (combined, n=51) or a control group (n=47). Cognition was assessed using the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test and the CogState computerized battery at baseline, 8 and 16 weeks post intervention. Physical fitness assessments were performed at all time points. A subset (total n=45) of participants underwent [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans at 16 weeks (post-intervention). One hundred and ninety-one participants completed the study and the data of 172 participants were included in the final analysis. Compared with the control group, the combined group showed improved verbal episodic memory and significantly higher brain glucose metabolism in the left sensorimotor cortex after controlling for age, sex, premorbid IQ, apolipoprotein E (APOE) status and history of head injury. The higher cerebral glucose metabolism in this brain region was positively associated with improved verbal memory seen in the combined group only. Our study provides evidence that a specific combination of physical and mental exercises for 16 weeks can improve cognition and increase cerebral glucose metabolism in cognitively intact healthy older adults.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No FDG-PET study exists in conjunction with WM training.
“Finally, although some FDG-PET studies investigated neural correlates of mental exercise [34–36], no such PET study exists in conjunction with WM training.”
From Adaptive working memory training does not produce transfer effects in cognition and neuroimaging (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Shah, T., Verdile, G., Sohrabi, H., Campbell, A., Putland, E., Cheetham, C., Dhaliwal, S., Weinborn, M., Maruff, P., Darby, D., & Martins, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- Royal Perth Hospital (AU)
- Hollywood Private Hospital (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Curtin University (AU)
- Mental Health Research Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Martins, R N
- ORCID
- Venue
- Translational Psychiatry
- Published
- 2014-12-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e487-e487
- ISSN
- 2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4270308
- OpenAlex
- W2048216299
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Edith Cowan University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- physical activity, computerized cognitive training, brain training, verbal memory, episodic memory, brain glucose metabolism, older adults, cognitive aging, home-based exercise, sensorimotor cortex
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Combined Modality Therapy, Glucose, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Verbal Learning, Treatment Outcome, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-Emission Tomography, Memory, Episodic, Sensorimotor Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review