The link between inflammation, bugs, the intestine and the brain in alcohol dependence
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, some new processes have been proposed to explain how alcohol may influence behavior, psychological symptoms and alcohol seeking in alcohol-dependent subjects. In addition to its important effect on brain and neurotransmitters equilibrium, alcohol abuse also affects peripheral organs including the gut. By yet incompletely understood mechanisms, chronic alcohol abuse increases intestinal permeability and alters the composition of the gut microbiota, allowing bacterial components from the gut lumen to reach the systemic circulation. These gut-derived bacterial products are recognized by immune cells circulating in the blood or residing in target organs, which consequently synthesize and release pro-inflammatory cytokines. Circulating cytokines are considered important mediators of the gut-brain communication, as they can reach the central nervous system and induce neuroinflammation that is associated with change in mood, cognition and drinking behavior. These observations support the possibility that targeting the gut microbiota, by the use of probiotics or prebiotics, could restore the gut barrier function, reduce systemic inflammation and may have beneficial effect in treating alcohol dependence and in reducing alcohol relapse.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chronic alcohol abuse alters gut microbiome composition.
“Chronic alcohol abuse also alters gut microbiome composition (Leclercq et al., 2017)”
From Gut reactions: Breaking down xenobiotic–microbiome interactions (2019) · cites this paper as Leclercq et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 162 · Cited by 174
- Authors
- Leclercq, S., de Timary, P., Delzenne, N. M., & Stärkel, P.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Stärkel, P
- Venue
- Translational Psychiatry
- Published
- 2017-02-28
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e1048-e1048
- ISSN
- 2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5545644
- OpenAlex
- W2592740345
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 162
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Fondation Saint Luc
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Keywords
- alcoholism, gut-brain axis, gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, neuroinflammation, inflammatory cytokines, alcohol seeking, alcohol relapse, probiotics, prebiotics, intestinal barrier
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Affect, Alcoholism, Animals, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Inflammation, Intestinal Mucosa, Permeability, Cytokines, Probiotics, Prebiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review