The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aminopropylated MCMs as base catalysts: a comparison with aminopropylated silica
Abstract
Aminopropyl-functionalised MCMs, prepared via a one-pot method, are found to be effective base catalysts for the Knoevenagel reaction, with significant improvements in terms of turnover number and solvent dependence to the ostensibly similar aminopropylsilica.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ordered mesoporous materials in catalysis
Taguchi, A., & Schüth, F. (2005) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.06.030 · Cited by 2,119
SOMC@PMS. Surface Organometallic Chemistry at Periodic Mesoporous Silica
Anwander, R. (2001) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm0111534 · Cited by 320
Chitosan as a sustainable organocatalyst: A concise overview
El Kadib, A. (2015) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201402718 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Macquarrie, D. J., & Jackson, D. B.
- Venue
- Chemical Communications
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1997
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1781-1782
- ISSN
- 1359-7345 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-548X
- OpenAlex
- W2047909178
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aminopropylated MCMs as base catalysts: a comparison with aminopropylated silica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/a704156j
- The paper
- Macquarrie, D. J., & Jackson, D. B. (1997). Aminopropylated MCMs as base catalysts: a comparison with aminopropylated silica. Chemical Communications. https://doi.org/10.1039/a704156j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
