The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of the non-starch polysaccharides in plant foods by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates
Abstract
A method is reported for the measurement of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) from plant foods. NSP are the major components of “dietary fibre.” The polysaccharides are divided into cellulose and non-cellulosic material and the constituent sugars are determined by gas-liquid chromatography. Starch is removed, after gelatinisation, by incubation with hog pancreatic α-amylase together with pullulanase. The enzyme preparations are shown to be specific for the hydrolysis of α-1,4- and α-1,6-glucosidic bonds, and not to affect NSP. The starch-free material is then analysed by three separate but complementary procedures: (A) hydrolysis with 1 M sulphuric acid after solubilisation of cellulose with 12 M sulphuric acid; (B) hydrolysis with 1 M sulphuric acid; and (C) extraction with phosphate buffer at pH 7 and 100 °C, solubilisation of cellulose with 12 M sulphuric acid and then hydrolysis with 1 M sulphuric acid. Neutral sugars are measured by gas-liquid chromatography as alditol acetates and uronic acids by a colorimetric method. Starch made resistant to α-amylase digestion by food processing is identified by additional steps in procedure B, and measured as “resistant starch.” Procedure A gives total NSP and procedure B neutral non-cellulosic polysaccharides. A value for cellulose is obtained as the difference between glucose measured in procedures A and B. Procedure C gives NSP insoluble in phosphate buffer at pH 7. Soluble NSP is the difference between total NSP and insoluble NSP. Results for the NSP analysis of selected foods are given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sajilata, M. G., Singhal, R. S., & Kulkarni, P. R. (2006) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.tb00076.x · Cited by 1,660
Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding
Knudsen, K. E. B. (1997) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(97)00009-6 · Cited by 1,548
Dietary fibre in foods: A review
Dhingra, D., Michael, M., Rajput, H., & Patil, R. T. (2012) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0365-5 · Cited by 1,456
Diet-microbiota interactions and personalized nutrition
Kolodziejczyk, A. A., Zheng, D., & Elinav, E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0256-8 · Cited by 879
Health properties of resistant starch
Nugent, A. P. (2005) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1467-3010.2005.00481.x · Cited by 715
Metadata
- Authors
- Englyst, H., Wiggins, H. S., & Cummings, J. H.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1272
- Pages
- 307
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2036708983
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of the non-starch polysaccharides in plant foods by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/an9820700307
- The paper
- Englyst, H., Wiggins, H. S., & Cummings, J. H. (1982). Determination of the non-starch polysaccharides in plant foods by gas-liquid chromatography of constituent sugars as alditol acetates. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9820700307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.